Chew W, Sorrell T C, Gilbert G L
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Epidemiol Infect. 1994 Jun;112(3):543-9. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800051244.
Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was compared with seroagglutination for subtyping of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) bacteria. Seventy-five significant MAC isolates from patients with AIDS were typed by both methods and 36 isolates, judged to be clinically non-significant, were examined by TLC only. Overall, 75% of isolates tested were typable by seroagglutination and 91% by TLC; the results correlated between the two except for minor discrepancies. Serovars 1, 8 and 21 and mixed serovars 1-21 and 1-8-21 were common among isolates from AIDS patients and together represented 83% of isolates compared with only 36% in the non-significant group (odds ratio 8.4; 95% confidence interval 3.4-23.3). This difference remained significant after exclusion of serovar 41 (M. scrofulaceum), which was the commonest isolate (28%) in the non-significant group but was not isolated from patients with AIDS. TLC is useful to supplement seroagglutination for subtyping of MAC. Further study is required to determine whether apparent differences between isolates from patients with AIDS and from other sources reflect differences in virulence or in environmental prevalence of MAC subtypes.
对鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)细菌进行亚型分析时,将薄层色谱法(TLC)与血清凝集试验进行了比较。采用这两种方法对75株来自艾滋病患者的具有显著意义的MAC分离株进行分型,并仅通过TLC对36株被判定为临床意义不显著的分离株进行检测。总体而言,75%的检测分离株可用血清凝集试验分型,91%可用TLC分型;除了一些微小差异外,两种方法的结果具有相关性。血清型1、8和21以及混合血清型1 - 21和1 - 8 - 21在艾滋病患者的分离株中很常见,共占分离株的83%,而在无显著意义的组中仅占36%(优势比8.4;95%置信区间3.4 - 23.3)。排除血清型41(瘰疬分枝杆菌)后,这种差异仍然显著,血清型41是无显著意义组中最常见的分离株(28%),但未从艾滋病患者中分离到。TLC有助于补充血清凝集试验对MAC进行亚型分析。需要进一步研究以确定艾滋病患者与其他来源的分离株之间的明显差异是否反映了MAC亚型的毒力差异或环境流行率差异。