Bisgaard H, Pedersen S, Nikander K
Dept of Paediatrics, State University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Respir J. 1994 Apr;7(4):740-2. doi: 10.1183/09031936.94.07040740.
The question addressed in this study was the ability of young children to use a dry-powder inhaler, Turbuhaler. One hundred and sixty five children suspected of asthma, equally distributed in one year age-groups from 6 months to 8 yrs, inhaled from a Pulmicort Turbuhaler, 200 micrograms budesonide-dose-1, through a filter. The amount of drug trapped by the filter was used as a measure of drug released to the patient. None of the children had prior experience in the use of a Turbuhaler, but they were instructed carefully, together with their parents, in the clinic. The median dose released revealed an age-dependent increase, with a considerable scatter. Accordingly, the dose delivered could not be predicted in these young children. The limitation to effective use in young children appeared to be lack of sufficient co-operation, rather than physical limitations, as even some very young children appeared to obtain a sufficient activation of the device. It is likely that repeated training at home may improve these findings. In conclusion, our results indicate that dry-powder inhalers are not reliable in all circumstances for treatment of young children, and that careful and repeated tuition is required if such devices are to be used.
本研究探讨的问题是幼儿使用都保(Turbuhaler)干粉吸入器的能力。165名疑似哮喘儿童,按年龄平均分布在6个月至8岁的各个年龄段,通过过滤器从都保(Pulmicort Turbuhaler)吸入200微克布地奈德剂量-1。过滤器截留的药物量用作释放给患者药物量的指标。所有儿童此前均无使用都保的经验,但在诊所中,他们与父母一起接受了仔细的指导。释放剂量的中位数显示出与年龄相关的增加,且离散度较大。因此,无法预测这些幼儿的给药剂量。幼儿有效使用的限制似乎是缺乏足够的配合,而非身体限制,因为即使是一些非常年幼的儿童似乎也能充分启动该装置。在家中反复训练可能会改善这些结果。总之,我们的结果表明,干粉吸入器在治疗幼儿时并非在所有情况下都可靠,若要使用此类装置,需要仔细且反复的指导。