Validity of patient reporting and predictive value of industrial physical work demands.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective study analyzed industrial physical work demands. The patients (n = 103), sick-listed 8 weeks because of low back pain, were industrial blue-collar workers in the car manufacturing industry.

OBJECTIVES

This study described industrial physical work demands in a sample of patients with subacute low back pain (LBP), studied the agreement between reported and observed work postures, estimated compression load on the spine, and determined the predictive validity of industrial physical work demands and occupational LBP handicap.

METHODS

The patients (n = 103), sick-listed 8 weeks because of low back pain, were industrial blue-collar workers in the car manufacturing industry. Industrial physical work demands were reported by the patients and also studied at the work place. The patients' work demands commonly included lifting, forward bending, standing and twisting, working with the hands above the shoulders, and a compression load on the spine of more than 2000 N, and more than 60% of the patients believed that work demands caused their LBP.

RESULTS

Substantial or moderate agreement was found more often between the patients' reports and the physical therapists' observations of work postures. None of the studied industrial physical work demands predicted the rate of return to work or the sick-leave during the second follow-up year.

CONCLUSION

The correlations between reported or observed physical work demands, individual physical capacity, individual psychological capacity, spare-time activities, other factors and LBP are not clear. A workplace visit made by a physical therapist may facilitate the rehabilitation process, especially since many patients believed that work factors caused their LBP.