Watanabe S, Kondo T, Asakura N, Inomata S
Department of Anesthesia, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Anesth Analg. 1994 Jul;79(1):85-8. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199407000-00016.
Buprenorphine and indomethacin are quite different pharmacologically. The objective of this study was to determine the analgesic effect from their combined administration in suppository form. Eighty patients undergoing open cholecystectomy under nitrous oxide-oxygen-sevoflurane anesthesia, in addition to epidural anesthesia using lidocaine, were divided into four groups: Group A received buprenorphine 0.4 mg and indomethacin 50 mg; Group B, buprenorphine 0.4 mg; Group C, indomethacin 50 mg; and Group D, no drug. The drugs were administered after induction of general anesthesia. One patient was withdrawn because of the administration of the wrong drug. Patients in Group A required fewer analgesics, had a longer period of analgesic effect from the end of surgery, and enjoyed a better pain score. This group also included more patients who required no analgesics. We conclude that the combined administration of opioid and nonopioid suppositories may provide far better prophylactic analgesia than a single drug.
丁丙诺啡和吲哚美辛在药理上有很大不同。本研究的目的是确定其栓剂联合给药的镇痛效果。80例在氧化亚氮-氧气-七氟醚麻醉下接受开腹胆囊切除术的患者,除使用利多卡因进行硬膜外麻醉外,被分为四组:A组接受0.4mg丁丙诺啡和50mg吲哚美辛;B组,0.4mg丁丙诺啡;C组,50mg吲哚美辛;D组,不使用药物。药物在全身麻醉诱导后给药。一名患者因用药错误被剔除。A组患者需要的镇痛药较少,术后镇痛效果持续时间较长,疼痛评分较好。该组中不需要镇痛药的患者也更多。我们得出结论,阿片类和非阿片类栓剂联合给药可能比单一药物提供更好的预防性镇痛效果。