Lundqvist S, Hietala S O, Berglund C, Karp K
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Acta Radiol. 1994 Jul;35(4):391-5.
The total plasma clearance of iohexol at urography and 51Cr-EDTA was compared in 31 patients with di- or tetraparesis. A reference 51Cr-EDTA clearance was also performed 24 hours prior to the urography. The GFR was calculated from one, 2 or 4 plasma samples collected 180, 210, 240 and 270 min after the injection. An X-ray fluorescence analyzer was used for the analysis of iohexol in plasma as well as the contrast medium clearance calculations. It was shown that single or multiple sample clearance of iohexol and 51Cr-EDTA were equivalent methods for measurement of the GFR. The GFR was not affected by iohexol in a dose routinely used for urography. It was concluded that the patient comfort is improved if 51Cr-EDTA clearance is replaced by contrast medium clearance in association with urography.
在31例双瘫或四肢瘫患者中比较了碘海醇在尿路造影时的总血浆清除率和51铬-乙二胺四乙酸(51Cr-EDTA)的总血浆清除率。在尿路造影前24小时还进行了51Cr-EDTA清除率的参考测定。肾小球滤过率(GFR)是根据注射后180、210、240和270分钟采集的1份、2份或4份血浆样本计算得出的。使用X射线荧光分析仪分析血浆中的碘海醇以及计算造影剂清除率。结果表明,碘海醇和51Cr-EDTA的单次或多次样本清除率是测量GFR的等效方法。尿路造影常规使用剂量的碘海醇对GFR没有影响。得出的结论是,如果在尿路造影时用造影剂清除率代替51Cr-EDTA清除率,患者舒适度会提高。