[Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].

In this study we compare the influence of blurring by diffusor foils (Bangerter) on visual acuity and on the thresholds of ring and light sense perimetry. Light sense perimetry was performed using the G1 program of the Octopus 1-2-3 perimeter [1], and ring perimetry with the "ring" test, version 2.20 (High-Tech-Vision) designed by Frisén [4]. Ten eyes of ten healthy persons with a visual acuity of 1.25 or better were examined at six different levels corresponding to visual acuities between 1.6 and hand movements. With both perimeters sensitivity decreased with decreasing visual acuity. At good visual acuities (1.2-1.6) no changes were found in either ring perimetry or light sense perimetry. At acuity levels of 0.8 and below a more pronounced decrease in sensitivity was found with the ring perimeter than with the light sense perimeter. At the level of hand movements there were only absolute scotomas in the ring perimeter, while the Octopus 1-2-3 still detected a baseline sensitivity. Sensitivity was correlated with the logarithm of the visual acuity with both perimeters (Octopus 1-2-3: r = 0.99, P < 0.001; ring perimeter: r = 0.98, P < 0.001). The decrease in sensitivity per log-unit of visual acuity was 9.43 dB (Octopus 1-2-3) or 5.19 dB (ring perimeter). The ring perimeter, at least in its currently available version giving an absolute scotoma at mean scores > 14 dB, is obviously more sensitive to media opacities than the Octopus 1-2-3. This may be of importance in the clinical evaluation of the test results.