Suppr超能文献

解剖学和生理学瞳孔间距之间的差异。

Differences between anatomical and physiological interpupillary distance.

作者信息

Osuobeni E P, al-Fahdi M

机构信息

College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Am Optom Assoc. 1994 Apr;65(4):265-71.

PMID:8014368
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The interpupillary distance (IPD) is usually measured between the centers of the pupils (anatomical IPD) or between the visual axes (physiological IPD). We have investigated the differences between the two methods of measuring IPD.

METHODS

A millimeter ruler was used to measure the distance between the nasal and lateral limbus of 400 male Arab subjects (anatomical IPD). An Essilor corneal reflex pupillometer was employed to also measure the inter visual axes distance (physiological IPD) of the same group of subjects.

RESULTS

The anatomical IPD is on the average 0.10mm and 0.30mm wider than the physiological IPD at distance and near respectively. The calculated near physiological IPD is significantly different from the measured near physiological IPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although individual differences between anatomical and physiological IPDs could be clinically significant, generally, there is good agreement between the two. It is preferable to employ the monocular components of the physiological IPD in ophthalmic procedures.

摘要

背景

瞳孔间距(IPD)通常在瞳孔中心之间(解剖学IPD)或视轴之间(生理学IPD)进行测量。我们研究了测量IPD的两种方法之间的差异。

方法

使用毫米尺测量400名阿拉伯男性受试者鼻侧和颞侧角膜缘之间的距离(解剖学IPD)。同时使用依视路角膜反射瞳孔计测量同一组受试者的视轴间距离(生理学IPD)。

结果

解剖学IPD在远距离和近距离时分别比生理学IPD平均宽0.10mm和0.30mm。计算得出的近距离生理学IPD与测量得到的近距离生理学IPD有显著差异。

结论

尽管解剖学IPD和生理学IPD之间的个体差异在临床上可能具有重要意义,但总体而言,两者之间有较好的一致性。在眼科手术中,最好采用生理学IPD的单眼成分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验