Cella D F
Rush Cancer Institute, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 Apr;9(3):186-92. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)90129-5.
After years of second-class status, supportive care is increasingly being recognized for its importance. Included in this recognition is a concern for making more explicit the long-held conviction within medicine that no goal can logically be more important than optimal patient functioning and well-being. This effort to make more explicit the timeless value of medical care has evolved over the past two decades, and come to be labeled "quality of life" research. At its most fundamental level, quality of life is understood to be both subjective and multidimensional. Because it is subjective, it is best measured from the patient's perspective. Because it is multidimensional, its measurement requires the investigator to inquire about a range of areas of the patient's life, including physical well-being, functional ability, emotional well-being, and social well-being. The usual concern for symptom control, familiar to the palliative-care physician, can conceptually be expanded into a consideration of costs and benefits of various treatment options relative to their subjective perception of personal function and well-being. As our interest turns to the aggressive alleviation of specific ("target") symptoms, we must critically evaluate the complex relationships among symptom intensity, symptom duration, and overall quality of life.
在经历了多年的二等地位后,支持性护理的重要性日益得到认可。这种认可包括一种关切,即要更明确地表达医学领域长期以来的信念:从逻辑上讲,没有任何目标比患者的最佳功能状态和福祉更重要。在过去二十年里,这种使医疗护理的永恒价值更加明确的努力不断发展,并被贴上了“生活质量”研究的标签。从最基本的层面来看,生活质量被理解为既是主观的又是多维度的。由于它是主观的,最好从患者的角度进行衡量。由于它是多维度的,其衡量要求研究者询问患者生活的一系列领域,包括身体健康、功能能力、情绪健康和社会福祉。姑息治疗医生熟悉的对症状控制的通常关注,从概念上讲可以扩展为对各种治疗选择相对于患者对个人功能和福祉的主观认知的成本和效益的考虑。当我们的兴趣转向积极缓解特定(“目标”)症状时,我们必须批判性地评估症状强度、症状持续时间和总体生活质量之间的复杂关系。