Das T P, Jalali S
LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Ophthalmic Surg. 1994 Apr;25(4):236-9.
In a prospective randomized study of 50 consecutive eyes, we compared the safety and efficacy of draining subretinal fluid transchoroidally in primary scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using a needle, with the safety and efficacy of the same procedure using an angulated endolaser probe set at 1 W for 0.2 seconds, using an average of 2.4 laser burns. There were no significant complications associated with the laser-aided drainage procedures (25 eyes). In the transchoroidal needle drainage procedures (25 eyes), subretinal hemorrhage occurred in three eyes and retinal incarceration in one. Thus, though our numbers are small, there appears to be some advantage of laser-assisted drainage in terms of a lower incidence of complications.
在一项对50只连续眼的前瞻性随机研究中,我们比较了在原发性巩膜扣带术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离时,经脉络膜用针经视网膜下引流液体的安全性和有效性,以及使用角度可调的内激光探头设置为1瓦、持续0.2秒、平均进行2.4次激光烧灼的相同操作的安全性和有效性。激光辅助引流手术(25只眼)未出现显著并发症。在经脉络膜针引流手术(25只眼)中,3只眼发生视网膜下出血,1只眼发生视网膜嵌顿。因此,尽管我们的样本量较小,但激光辅助引流在并发症发生率较低方面似乎具有一定优势。