Trnobranski P H
North Staffordshire College of Nursing and Midwifery, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, England.
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Apr;19(4):733-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01145.x.
The current socio-political philosophy in the United Kingdom promotes the belief that consumers of health care should exercise choice and express opinions about the care they receive. This view challenges the traditional paternalistic approach to health care which espoused that 'the professional knows best'. In association with general socio-political trends, nursing is undergoing radical reform. The nursing literature widely promotes the importance of a nurse-patient relationship which fosters the involvement of the patient in negotiation and decision-making regarding his care. Nurses who advocate individualized, holistic care must hold such an ideology as a central tenet to their philosophy. However, it is questionable whether this philosophy is widely expressed in the reality of clinical practice. There is also an absence of empirical evidence to support the assumption that patients wish to participate in decision-making. This paper critically reviews some of the debate centred around the concept of nurse-patient negotiation. It is suggested that the issues are complex and that there remains a need for further research which takes into account multiple factors, including the social and organization context of nursing care.
英国当前的社会政治理念倡导这样一种观念,即医疗保健消费者应该能够做出选择,并对他们所接受的护理表达意见。这种观点对传统的家长式医疗保健方法提出了挑战,传统方法认为“专业人员最清楚”。与一般社会政治趋势相关联,护理正在经历彻底的改革。护理文献广泛宣扬护士与患者关系的重要性,这种关系有助于患者参与有关其护理的协商和决策。倡导个性化整体护理的护士必须将这种理念作为其哲学的核心宗旨。然而,这种理念在临床实践的现实中是否得到广泛体现,这是值得怀疑的。也缺乏实证证据来支持患者希望参与决策这一假设。本文批判性地审视了一些围绕护士与患者协商概念的争论。有人认为这些问题很复杂,仍然需要进一步的研究,该研究要考虑到多种因素,包括护理的社会和组织背景。