Gripshover D L, Dacey C M
Department of Psychology, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio 45207-6411.
J Stud Alcohol. 1994 May;55(3):303-8. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1994.55.303.
The discriminative validity of the MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale (MAC) was examined with regards to race and sex in a clinic with a high base rate of substance abusers. Subjects included 168 men (17 blacks, 151 whites) and 32 women (6 blacks, 26 whites). All subjects were assigned to either a psychoactive substance disorder group (n = 172) or no psychoactive substance disorder group (n = 28) based on DSM-III-R criteria. Using the optimal cutting score that provided the best overall accuracy, chi-square analyses indicated the MAC scale significantly discriminated substance abusers among samples of blacks and white men but did not significantly discriminate substance abusers among samples of whites, men, women, or white women. When the standard MAC scale cutting score of 24 was used, the overall accuracy decreased for each sample but resulted in significant chi-square analyses for the samples of whites, men, women and white men but not for blacks or white women. Results indicated the MAC scale is not an efficacious discriminator in settings with a high base rate of substance abusers.
在一个药物滥用者比例较高的诊所中,针对种族和性别对麦克安德鲁酒精中毒量表(MAC)的区分效度进行了检验。研究对象包括168名男性(17名黑人,151名白人)和32名女性(6名黑人,26名白人)。根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)标准,所有研究对象被分为精神活性物质障碍组(n = 172)或无精神活性物质障碍组(n = 28)。使用能提供最佳总体准确性的最佳分界分数,卡方分析表明,MAC量表在黑人和白人男性样本中能显著区分药物滥用者,但在白人、男性、女性或白人女性样本中不能显著区分药物滥用者。当使用MAC量表24分的标准分界分数时,每个样本的总体准确性都有所下降,但对白人、男性、女性和白人男性样本进行卡方分析时结果显著,而对黑人或白人女性样本则不显著。结果表明,在药物滥用者比例较高的环境中,MAC量表不是一个有效的区分工具。