Kemmlert K
Division of Applied Work Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Solna, Sweden.
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994 Mar;26(1):21-6.
One hundred and ninety-five reports on musculo-skeletal occupational injuries were collected and randomised into two groups: one group where the work places of the injured were visited by labour inspectors (LIs) and one control group. The inspectors were instructed to issue inspection notices (INs) where appropriate. Ninety-two such visits were paid and resulted in 20 INs. Approximately 15 months later all 195 work places were visited by 3 ergonomists and the ergonomic situations were assessed. When compared with the control group neither the visits from the LIs nor the INs issued were associated with reduced work load among the injured. However, at most work places also other employees were performing the same tasks as the injured persons. Among these employees there was a significant reduction of work load where INs had been issued to the employers. Thus, the main effects of the LI interventions were in primary preventive measures.
收集了195份肌肉骨骼职业伤害报告,并随机分为两组:一组是劳动监察员(LIs)走访受伤人员的工作场所,另一组为对照组。监察员接到指示,在适当情况下发出检查通知(INs)。进行了92次此类走访,共发出20份检查通知。大约15个月后,3名人体工程学专家走访了所有195个工作场所,并对人体工程学情况进行了评估。与对照组相比,劳动监察员的走访和发出的检查通知均与受伤人员工作量的减少无关。然而,在大多数工作场所,其他员工也在执行与受伤人员相同的任务。在这些员工中,向雇主发出检查通知的地方工作量显著减少。因此,劳动监察员干预的主要效果体现在初级预防措施方面。