Schiller N G, Crystal S, Lewellen D
Department of Anthropology, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824.
Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(10):1337-46. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90272-0.
AIDS researchers and policy makers have often employed the concept of 'culture' to characterize 'high risk groups' and explain why members of these groups continue to practice 'risky behavior.' We argue that the widespread interest in ethnography tends to reflect a usage of the concept of culture that distances and subordinates. People with AIDS are portrayed as either minority street people abandoned by friends and family or as white gay men who live within a gay community, and in either case as socially deviant. This construction of HIV disease has facilitated distancing and denial of personal risk by persons outside the 'high risk groups,' impeding prevention efforts. Perceptions of subcultures of risk groups are contrasted with data on a random sample of persons with AIDS in New Jersey.
艾滋病研究人员和政策制定者常常运用“文化”这一概念来界定“高危群体”,并解释这些群体的成员为何持续从事“危险行为”。我们认为,对人种志的广泛关注往往反映出一种对文化概念的运用,这种运用使文化与其他事物产生距离并处于从属地位。艾滋病患者要么被描绘成被朋友和家人抛弃的少数街头人群,要么被描绘成生活在同性恋社区的白人同性恋男性,无论哪种情况,他们都被视为社会异类。这种对艾滋病的建构使得“高危群体”之外的人得以与个人风险保持距离并否认其存在,从而阻碍了预防工作。对风险群体亚文化的认知与新泽西州艾滋病患者随机样本的数据形成了对比。