Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜超声检查。常规术中胆管造影的替代方法?

Laparoscopic sonography. An alternative to routine intraoperative cholangiography?

作者信息

Röthlin M A, Schlumpf R, Largiadèr F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Zürich University Hospital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1994 Jul;129(7):694-700. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420310024004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether laparoscopic sonography (LS) could be a valid alternative to intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in the detection of bile duct stones and anatomical variations.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled study comparing LS and IOC using intraoperative findings and/or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the gold standard.

SETTING

Department of Surgery at Zürich University Hospital, Switzerland.

PATIENTS

One hundred consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 1992 and January 1993. Twenty-three patients were operated on for acute cholecystitis, while the remainder experienced symptomatic bile duct stones. Ninety-six patients underwent preoperative sonography and 85 underwent intravenous cholangiography. Laparoscopic sonography was performed in all patients after dissection of the cystic duct.

INTERVENTIONS

A 5.5-MHz sector scanner with a 360 degrees angle and an optimal depth of 1 to 4 cm was used. After LS, IOC was performed with a 4F ureteric catheter and a modern fluoroscope. Patients with bile duct stones were sent for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography postoperatively or the stones were removed laparoscopically.

RESULTS

Unsuspected common duct stones in three patients and several small calculi in the cystic duct in one patient were detected intraoperatively. Sensitivities and specificities for the detection of bile duct calculi were 100% and 98% by LS and 75% and 99% by IOC, respectively. Anatomical variations of the extrahepatic bile ducts were detected by LS in 20 patients and by IOC in 21 patients. Laparoscopic sonography visualized variations of the hepatic arteries in 22 patients. The average time consumption for LS was 5.4 minutes (range, 2 to 12 minutes) and 16.4 minutes for IOC (range, 4 to 37 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic sonography is a quick and reliable intraoperative diagnostic tool and could replace IOC in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Additional trials in a larger patient population are needed for a final assessment.

摘要

目的

确定在检测胆管结石和解剖变异方面,腹腔镜超声检查(LS)是否可成为术中胆管造影(IOC)的有效替代方法。

设计

前瞻性对照研究,以术中发现和/或术后内镜逆行胰胆管造影作为金标准,比较LS和IOC。

地点

瑞士苏黎世大学医院外科。

患者

1992年1月至1993年1月期间连续100例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。23例因急性胆囊炎接受手术,其余患者有症状性胆管结石。96例患者术前行超声检查,85例患者行静脉胆管造影。所有患者在解剖胆囊管后均行腹腔镜超声检查。

干预措施

使用一台360度角、最佳深度为1至4厘米的5.5兆赫扇形扫描仪。在LS检查后,用4F输尿管导管和现代荧光镜进行IOC检查。胆管结石患者术后接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影检查,或通过腹腔镜取出结石。

结果

术中发现3例患者有未被怀疑的胆总管结石,1例患者胆囊管内有多个小结石。LS检测胆管结石的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和98%,IOC分别为75%和99%。20例患者通过LS检测到肝外胆管的解剖变异,21例患者通过IOC检测到。22例患者通过腹腔镜超声检查观察到肝动脉变异。LS的平均检查时间为5.4分钟(范围为2至12分钟),IOC为16.4分钟(范围为4至37分钟)。

结论

腹腔镜超声检查是一种快速可靠的术中诊断工具,可在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中替代IOC。需要在更大的患者群体中进行进一步试验以进行最终评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验