Suppr超能文献

袖带放气法与瓦尔萨尔瓦动作及肢体压迫法在检测静脉瓣膜反流方面的比较。

A comparison of the cuff deflation method with Valsalva's maneuver and limb compression in detecting venous valvular reflux.

作者信息

Markel A, Meissner M H, Manzo R A, Bergelin R O, Strandness D E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1994 Jul;129(7):701-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420310033005.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to test the results of Valsalva's maneuver and limb compression against the standing-cuff inflation-deflation method for the detection of venous valvular reflux.

DESIGN

The study was conducted in 67 patients (134 extremities) who had an episode of deep vein thrombosis. An ultrasonic duplex scanner was used to evaluate two methods of testing for reflux. The most commonly used methods are Valsalva's maneuver and limb compression, both of which can raise the venous pressure and promote reflux. With the cuff method, the patient is studied in the standing position. The cuffs are segmentally placed (thigh to foot) with reflux encouraged when the inflated cuff is suddenly deflated.

SETTING

The patients were a part of a long-term natural history study of acute deep vein thrombosis and its effects on venous valve function.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Valvular reflux was documented by the appearance of retrograde flow in the vein when the normal transvalvular pressure gradient was reversed.

RESULTS

Both limb compression and Valsalva's maneuver can elicit reflux, but the maneuvers are difficult to standardize and come up with meaningful results. With the cuff inflation-deflation method, the time to valve closure was less than 0.5 seconds in 95% of normal subjects. The results were easier to quantify and worked well for all segments of the venous systems--superficial and deep.

CONCLUSIONS

The cuff inflation-deflation method provides more uniform quantifiable results for detecting reflux in the superficial and deep veins of the leg.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对比瓦尔萨尔瓦动作和肢体压迫法与站立袖带充气-放气法检测静脉瓣膜反流的结果。

设计

对67例(134条肢体)有深静脉血栓形成发作史的患者进行了研究。使用超声双功扫描仪评估两种反流检测方法。最常用的方法是瓦尔萨尔瓦动作和肢体压迫,这两种方法均可提高静脉压力并促进反流。采用袖带法时,患者需站立位接受检查。袖带分段放置(从大腿至足部),充气袖带突然放气时可促使反流发生。

背景

这些患者是急性深静脉血栓形成及其对静脉瓣膜功能影响的长期自然史研究的一部分。

观察指标

当正常的跨瓣膜压力梯度逆转时,静脉内出现逆流即记录瓣膜反流。

结果

肢体压迫和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作均可引发反流,但这些动作难以标准化并得出有意义的结果。采用袖带充气-放气法时,95%的正常受试者瓣膜关闭时间小于0.5秒。结果更易于量化,对静脉系统的所有节段(浅静脉和深静脉)均适用。

结论

袖带充气-放气法在检测小腿浅静脉和深静脉反流方面可提供更一致的可量化结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验