D'Andrea J A, Thomas A, Hatcher D J
Aviation Performance Division, Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Pensacola, Florida.
Bioelectromagnetics. 1994;15(2):163-76. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250150207.
Limits on the exposure to high-peak-power, short-duration microwave pulses have only recently been adopted. Additional data, however, are needed to understand the effects that may be produced by exposure to high-peak-power pulsed microwaves. Four male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained on an operant task for food pellet reward to investigate the behavioral effects of very high-peak-power 5.62 GHz microwaves. The operant task required monkeys to pull one plastic lever on a variable interval schedule (VI-25 s) and then respond to color signals and pull a second lever to obtain food. The monkeys were conditioned to perform a color discrimination task using one of three colors displayed by a fiber-optic cable. A red signal was the discriminative stimulus for responding on the first lever. A response on the second lever when a green signal was presented (1 s duration) delivered a food pellet. If a response on the second lever was made in the presence of a white signal, a 30-s timeout occurred. While performing the behavioral task, the monkeys were exposed to microwave pulses produced by either a military radar (FPS-26A) operating at 5.62 GHz or the same radar coupled to a Stanford linear energy doubler (SLED) pulse-forming device (ITT-2972) that enhanced peak power by a factor of nine by adding a high power pulse to the radar pulse. The effects of both types of pulses were compared to sham exposure. Peak field power densities tested were 518, 1270, and 2520 W/cm2 for SLED pulses and 56, 128, and 277 W/cm2 for the radar pulses. The microwave pulses (radar or SLED) were delivered at 100 pps (2.8 microseconds radar pulse duration; approximately 50 ns SLED pulse duration) for 20 min and produced averaged whole-body SARs of 2, 4, or 6 W/kg. Compared to sham exposures, significant alterations of lever responding, reaction time, and earned food pellets occurred during microwave exposure at 4 and 6 W/kg but not at 2 W/kg. There were no differences between radar or SLED pulses in producing behavioral effects.
对高峰值功率、短持续时间微波脉冲的暴露限制直到最近才被采用。然而,还需要更多数据来了解暴露于高峰值功率脉冲微波可能产生的影响。四只雄性恒河猴(猕猴)接受了一项操作性任务训练,以获取食物颗粒奖励,以此来研究5.62千兆赫的极高功率微波的行为影响。该操作性任务要求猴子按照可变间隔时间表(VI - 25秒)拉动一个塑料杠杆,然后对颜色信号做出反应并拉动第二个杠杆以获取食物。猴子们通过使用光纤电缆显示的三种颜色之一来完成颜色辨别任务。红色信号是对拉动第一个杠杆的辨别性刺激。当出现绿色信号(持续1秒)时拉动第二个杠杆会得到一个食物颗粒。如果在白色信号出现时拉动第二个杠杆,则会有30秒的超时。在执行行为任务时,猴子们暴露于由工作在5.62千兆赫的军事雷达(FPS - 26A)产生的微波脉冲下,或者暴露于与斯坦福直线能量倍增器(SLED)脉冲形成装置(ITT - 2972)耦合的同一雷达产生的微波脉冲下,该装置通过向雷达脉冲添加高功率脉冲将峰值功率提高了九倍。将这两种类型脉冲的影响与假暴露进行了比较。测试的峰值场功率密度对于SLED脉冲分别为518、1270和2520瓦/平方厘米,对于雷达脉冲分别为56、128和277瓦/平方厘米。微波脉冲(雷达或SLED)以每秒100次的频率发射(雷达脉冲持续时间为2.8微秒;SLED脉冲持续时间约为50纳秒),持续20分钟,产生的平均全身比吸收率分别为2、4或6瓦/千克。与假暴露相比,在4瓦/千克和6瓦/千克的微波暴露期间,杠杆反应、反应时间和获得的食物颗粒出现了显著变化,但在2瓦/千克时没有。在产生行为影响方面,雷达脉冲和SLED脉冲之间没有差异。