• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类(智人)、松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)和鸽子(家鸽)对直立和倒置灵长类动物面部图片的记忆。

Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia).

作者信息

Phelps M T, Roberts W A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 1994 Jun;108(2):114-25. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.114.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.114
PMID:8026162
Abstract

Humans (Homo sapiens) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) were tested for memory of upright and inverted primate faces. Working memory was tested in Experiment 1 with a delayed matching-to-sample procedure, and reference memory was examined in Experiment 2 by requiring subjects to learn to discriminate between successive pairs of upright or inverted pictures. Both human and monkey subjects showed better working memory for upright than for inverted human faces and better reference memory for upright than for inverted human and great ape faces. In Experiment 3, reference memory tests with pigeons (Columba livia) showed no effects of inversion on rate of learning with face pictures. We argue that these findings cannot be explained easily by an individual primate's lifetime experiences with primate faces. We suggest that similar evolved mechanisms for primate face recognition in people and monkeys are responsible for the pattern of data reported.

摘要

对人类(智人)和松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)进行了直立和倒置灵长类动物面部记忆测试。实验1采用延迟样本匹配程序测试工作记忆,实验2通过要求受试者学习区分连续的直立或倒置图片对来检验参考记忆。人类和猴子受试者对直立人类面孔的工作记忆都比对倒置人类面孔的更好,对直立人类和大猩猩面孔的参考记忆比对倒置的更好。在实验3中,对鸽子(家鸽)的参考记忆测试表明,倒置对面部图片学习速度没有影响。我们认为,这些发现无法轻易用个体灵长类动物与灵长类动物面孔的终生经历来解释。我们建议,人类和猴子中类似的灵长类动物面部识别进化机制是所报告数据模式的原因。

相似文献

1
Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia).人类(智人)、松鼠猴(松鼠猴属)和鸽子(家鸽)对直立和倒置灵长类动物面部图片的记忆。
J Comp Psychol. 1994 Jun;108(2):114-25. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.114.
2
The Thatcher illusion in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).松鼠猴(Saimiri sciureus)中的撒切尔错觉。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):517-23. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0479-9. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
3
Monkey and human face perception: inversion effects for human faces but not for monkey faces or scenes.猴子和人类的面孔感知:人类面孔的反转效应,但猴子面孔或场景没有反转效应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Summer;8(3):278-90. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.3.278.
4
Rapid Categorization of Human and Ape Faces in 9-Month-Old Infants Revealed by Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation.快速周期性视觉刺激揭示 9 个月大婴儿对人脸的快速分类:人类和猿类。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 2;7(1):12526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12760-2.
5
Electrophysiological evidence for parts and wholes in visual face memory.视觉面部记忆中部分与整体的电生理证据。
Cortex. 2016 Oct;83:246-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).视觉背景对鸽子(家鸽)和人类(智人)图案辨别能力的不同影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):200-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.2.200.
7
Face processing in humans and new world monkeys: the influence of experiential and ecological factors.人类和新大陆猴的面部处理:经验和生态因素的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2007 Apr;10(2):125-34. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0045-4. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
8
Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment.为什么 N170 对倒置的人脸增强?一项 ERP 竞争实验。
Neuroimage. 2010 Nov 1;53(2):782-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.029. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
9
Comparison of neuronal responses in primate inferior-temporal cortex and feed-forward deep neural network model with regard to information processing of faces.灵长类动物下颞叶皮质与前馈深度神经网络模型在面部信息处理方面的神经元反应比较。
J Comput Neurosci. 2021 Aug;49(3):251-257. doi: 10.1007/s10827-021-00778-5. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
10
Responses of ectostriatal neurons during delayed matching-to-sample behavior in pigeons (Columba livia).鸽子(家鸽)在延迟样本匹配行为期间外纹状体神经元的反应。
Brain Res. 2001 Oct 26;917(1):55-66. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02906-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images.鸽子视觉网络中的神经元能够区分面部、面部乱序和正弦光栅图像。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 12;12(1):589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04559-z.
2
Comparing the face inversion effect in crows and humans.比较乌鸦和人类的面部倒置效应。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2017 Dec;203(12):1017-1027. doi: 10.1007/s00359-017-1211-7. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
3
Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.物体识别机制:我们从鸽子身上学到的东西。
Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Oct 13;8:122. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00122. eCollection 2014.
4
Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system.朝向人类视觉系统中面部和物体识别的统一模型。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 15;4:497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00497. eCollection 2013.
5
The evolution of holistic processing of faces.面孔整体加工的演变。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 31;4:11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00011. eCollection 2013.
6
A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.一项使用打乱面部图像进行面部处理的对比研究。
Perception. 2012;41(4):460-73. doi: 10.1068/p7151.
7
The evolution of face processing in primates.灵长类动物的面部加工进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1764-77. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0358.
8
The evolution of social orienting: evidence from chicks (Gallus gallus) and human newborns.社会定向的进化:来自小鸡(Gallus gallus)和人类新生儿的证据。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 20;6(4):e18802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018802.
9
A comparative view of face perception.面部感知的比较视角。
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Aug;124(3):233-51. doi: 10.1037/a0019460.
10
Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: a comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys.视觉专长无法预测跨物种的综合效应:蜘蛛猴(蛛猴属)与恒河猴(猕猴属)的比较。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Oct 7.