Volpenhein D W, Walsh M E, Dellerman P A, Burkett T A
J Clin Dent. 1994;5(1):27-33.
A new in vitro method for determining interproximal penetration of different toothbrush designs is reported. This method is based on videotape recordings of the brushing patterns of 31 subjects. Circular, up-and-down, and back-and-forth brush strokes were all employed, with the brush being set at both 45 degrees and 90 degrees angles for back-and-forth brushing. Overall results were weighted according to the proportion of brushing time during which participants typically use each stroke. The tooth morphology was closely simulated by the use of typodonts. Interproximal penetration was measured by removal of "artificial plaque" (an ethyl ester of PVM/MA copolymer) shown to have a tenacity on the typodont tooth surface similar to 12-hour plaque as measured on 6 subjects. The brushing force used was based on the measured brushing force of 8 panelists during actual brushing and was consistent with forces reported in the literature. This method was used to test the interproximal penetration of three different toothbrush designs: rippled pattern (Crest Complete), multi-level (Colgate Precision), and flat-tufted (Oral-B P40). The Crest Complete was found to provide superior interproximal penetration to Oral-B P40 and Colgate Precision for all brushing techniques, although its advantage over the Colgate Precision failed to reach statistical significance for back-and-forth brushing with the brush at a 45 degree angle to the tooth. The Colgate Precision was superior to the Oral-B overall, and for three of four brushing techniques tested. There was no difference between the two brushes on back-and-forth brushing at a 90 degree angle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
报道了一种用于测定不同牙刷设计的牙间隙渗透情况的新体外方法。该方法基于对31名受试者刷牙模式的录像记录。采用了圆周、上下和前后刷牙动作,前后刷牙时牙刷与牙齿的角度分别设置为45度和90度。总体结果根据参与者在每种刷牙动作中通常使用的刷牙时间比例进行加权。使用人工牙模型紧密模拟牙齿形态。通过去除“人工牙菌斑”(PVM/MA共聚物的乙酯)来测量牙间隙渗透情况,在人工牙模型牙齿表面,该物质的黏性显示与6名受试者12小时形成的牙菌斑相似。所使用的刷牙力基于8名小组成员实际刷牙时测得的刷牙力,与文献报道的力一致。该方法用于测试三种不同牙刷设计的牙间隙渗透情况:波纹图案(佳洁士全效)、多层设计(高露洁精准)和平毛簇设计(欧乐-B P40)。结果发现,对于所有刷牙技术,佳洁士全效在牙间隙渗透方面优于欧乐-B P40和高露洁精准,不过在与牙齿呈45度角进行前后刷牙时,其相对于高露洁精准的优势未达到统计学意义。总体而言,高露洁精准优于欧乐-B,在测试的四种刷牙技术中有三种是这样。在与牙齿呈90度角进行前后刷牙时,两种牙刷之间没有差异。(摘要截选至250词)