• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床验证牙刷机器人模拟——比较菌斑清除效果。

Clinical validation of robot simulation of toothbrushing--comparative plaque removal efficacy.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Department of Dentistry, University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str, 50, 58448 Witten, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2014 Jul 4;14:82. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-82.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6831-14-82
PMID:24996973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4094541/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical validation of laboratory toothbrushing tests has important advantages. It was, therefore, the aim to demonstrate correlation of tooth cleaning efficiency of a new robot brushing simulation technique with clinical plaque removal.

METHODS

Clinical programme: 27 subjects received dental cleaning prior to 3-day-plaque-regrowth-interval. Plaque was stained, photographically documented and scored using planimetrical index. Subjects brushed teeth 33-47 with three techniques (horizontal, rotating, vertical), each for 20s buccally and for 20s orally in 3 consecutive intervals. The force was calibrated, the brushing technique was video supported. Two different brushes were randomly assigned to the subject. Robot programme: Clinical brushing programmes were transfered to a 6-axis-robot. Artificial teeth 33-47 were covered with plaque-simulating substrate. All brushing techniques were repeated 7 times, results were scored according to clinical planimetry. All data underwent statistical analysis by t-test, U-test and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The individual clinical cleaning patterns are well reproduced by the robot programmes. Differences in plaque removal are statistically significant for the two brushes, reproduced in clinical and robot data. Multivariate analysis confirms the higher cleaning efficiency for anterior teeth and for the buccal sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The robot tooth brushing simulation programme showed good correlation with clinically standardized tooth brushing.This new robot brushing simulation programme can be used for rapid, reproducible laboratory testing of tooth cleaning.

摘要

背景

临床验证实验室牙刷测试具有重要优势。因此,本研究旨在证明一种新型机器人刷牙模拟技术的牙齿清洁效率与临床牙菌斑去除之间的相关性。

方法

临床方案:27 名受试者在 3 天牙菌斑再生长间隔期之前接受牙齿清洁。使用平面指数对菌斑进行染色、照相记录和评分。受试者使用三种技术(水平、旋转、垂直)刷牙 33-47 次,每个技术的颊侧和舌侧各刷 20 秒,连续 3 个间隔。力被校准,刷牙技术得到视频支持。将两种不同的牙刷随机分配给受试者。机器人方案:将临床刷牙方案转移到 6 轴机器人上。人工牙 33-47 覆盖有菌斑模拟底物。所有刷牙技术均重复 7 次,根据临床平面测量法进行评分。所有数据均通过 t 检验、U 检验和多元分析进行统计分析。

结果

机器人方案可很好地再现个体临床清洁模式。两种牙刷在牙菌斑去除方面存在差异,在临床和机器人数据中均得到重现。多元分析证实了前牙和颊侧部位的清洁效率更高。

结论

机器人牙刷模拟方案与临床标准化牙刷测试具有良好的相关性。这种新的机器人刷牙模拟方案可用于快速、可重复的牙齿清洁实验室测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/f186b313ca13/1472-6831-14-82-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/2238f7f4da78/1472-6831-14-82-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/446abe101684/1472-6831-14-82-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/d3ae21fe781d/1472-6831-14-82-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/1b4f507df956/1472-6831-14-82-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/f186b313ca13/1472-6831-14-82-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/2238f7f4da78/1472-6831-14-82-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/446abe101684/1472-6831-14-82-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/d3ae21fe781d/1472-6831-14-82-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/1b4f507df956/1472-6831-14-82-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/209c/4094541/f186b313ca13/1472-6831-14-82-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical validation of robot simulation of toothbrushing--comparative plaque removal efficacy.临床验证牙刷机器人模拟——比较菌斑清除效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Jul 4;14:82. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-82.
2
Video instruction to establish a panel of experts to compare tooth cleaning by 4 electric toothbrushes.关于组建专家小组以比较4款电动牙刷清洁牙齿效果的视频说明。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Oct;28(10):917-22. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028010917.x.
3
Brush head wear, subject-perceived and laboratory cleaning performance of two oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush heads over 3 months.两种旋转振荡式电动牙刷刷头在3个月内的刷头磨损情况、受试者感知及实验室清洁性能
Am J Dent. 2012 Apr;25(2):84-90.
4
Laboratory evaluations of elmex inter X toothbrushes for interproximal access efficacy and posterior tooth surface cleaning.elmex inter X牙刷的邻面清洁效果及后牙表面清洁的实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(6):249-52.
5
Comparative professional plaque removal study using 8 branded toothbrushes.使用8种品牌牙刷的专业菌斑清除效果对比研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Apr;29(4):310-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290406.x.
6
Effect of brushing force and time on plaque removal using a powered toothbrush.使用电动牙刷时刷牙力度和时间对牙菌斑清除的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 May;30(5):409-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.20008.x.
7
Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control.专业手动牙刷清洁效果和改进力控制的机器人和机械测试。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 8;22(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02211-4.
8
A laboratory and clinical investigation comparing 2 oscillating/rotating electric toothbrushes.一项比较两款振动/旋转式电动牙刷的实验室及临床研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2000 Apr;27(4):277-83. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027004277.x.
9
Efficacy of straight versus angled interdental brushes on interproximal tooth cleaning: a randomized controlled trial.直型与角度型邻间牙刷对邻面牙齿清洁效果的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2014 May;12(2):152-7. doi: 10.1111/idh.12042. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
10
Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force.手动牙刷的菌斑清除效果与刷牙力度之间的关系。
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):413-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02464.x.

引用本文的文献

1
In-Vitro Tooth Cleaning Efficacy and Filament End Rounding of Different Manual Children's Toothbrushes.不同手动儿童牙刷的体外洁牙效果和刷毛末端磨圆。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Jul 22;22:277-284. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5573917.
2
Cleaning performance of electric toothbrushes around brackets applying different brushing forces: an in-vitro study.不同刷牙力度下电动牙刷对牙套周围的清洁效果:一项体外研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 11;14(1):5921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56017-1.
3
A Study on the Biofilm Removal Efficacy of a Bioelectric Toothbrush.

本文引用的文献

1
Plaque-removing efficacy of new and used manual toothbrushes--a professional brushing study.新、旧手动牙刷洁牙效果的比较——一项专业刷牙研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2013 Nov;11(4):237-43. doi: 10.1111/idh.12021. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
2
Brush head wear, subject-perceived and laboratory cleaning performance of two oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush heads over 3 months.两种旋转振荡式电动牙刷刷头在3个月内的刷头磨损情况、受试者感知及实验室清洁性能
Am J Dent. 2012 Apr;25(2):84-90.
3
Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health.
生物电牙刷去除牙菌斑效果的研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Oct 13;10(10):1184. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101184.
4
Impact of manual toothbrush design on plaque removal efficacy.手动牙刷设计对菌斑去除效果的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03518-6.
5
Robotics in Dentistry: A Narrative Review.牙科中的机器人技术:一篇叙述性综述。
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;11(3):62. doi: 10.3390/dj11030062.
6
Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control.专业手动牙刷清洁效果和改进力控制的机器人和机械测试。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 8;22(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02211-4.
7
Meta-analysis on the association between the frequency of tooth brushing and hypertension risk.刷牙频率与高血压风险关联的荟萃分析
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Jun;24(6):689-697. doi: 10.1111/jch.14498. Epub 2022 May 31.
8
Associations of oral hygiene with incident hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A population based cohort study in Southwest China.口腔卫生与高血压和 2 型糖尿病发病的相关性:中国西南地区一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Apr;24(4):483-492. doi: 10.1111/jch.14451. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
9
Dental Robotics: A Disruptive Technology.口腔机器人:一种颠覆性技术。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 11;21(10):3308. doi: 10.3390/s21103308.
10
[Recent progress of robots in stomatology].[机器人在口腔医学领域的最新进展]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 1;38(1):90-94. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.01.016.
用于控制牙菌斑和维护牙龈健康的不同动力牙刷。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;2010(12):CD004971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004971.pub2.
4
In vitro tooth cleaning efficacy of electric toothbrushes around brackets.托槽周围电动牙刷的体外牙齿清洁效果。
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Oct;32(5):481-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp166. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
5
Effects of toothbrushing force on the mineral content and demineralized organic matrix of eroded dentine.刷牙力度对侵蚀性牙本质矿物质含量及脱矿有机基质的影响。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Jun;117(3):255-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00617.x.
6
In vitro tooth cleaning efficacy of manual toothbrushes around brackets.正畸托槽周围手动牙刷的体外洁牙效果
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Feb;31(1):103-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn070. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
7
Tooth brushing habits in uninstructed adults--frequency, technique, duration and force.未接受指导的成年人的刷牙习惯——频率、方法、时长和力度。
Clin Oral Investig. 2009 Jun;13(2):203-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-008-0230-8. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
8
A laboratory comparison of the efficacy of battery-operated, non-rechargeable power toothbrushes.电动、不可充电式电动牙刷功效的实验室对比
Am J Dent. 2001 Nov;14 Spec No:5B-8B.
9
Comparative professional plaque removal study using 8 branded toothbrushes.使用8种品牌牙刷的专业菌斑清除效果对比研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Apr;29(4):310-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290406.x.
10
A robot system for evaluating plaque removal efficiency of toothbrushes in vitro.一种用于体外评估牙刷菌斑清除效率的机器人系统。
Quintessence Int. 1997 Jul;28(7):441-5.