Emery R E, Matthews S G, Kitzmann K M
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22903-2477.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Feb;62(1):124-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.62.1.124.
A 1-year follow-up study was conducted on families randomly assigned to settle custody disputes either in mediation or through adversary procedures. Consistent with Time 1 reports, at Time 2 fathers who mediated were substantially more satisfied than were fathers who litigated. Fathers who mediated also complied more with child support orders. Contrary to prediction, the greater satisfaction and compliance of fathers did not lead to increased satisfaction among mothers who mediated. In contrast to Time 1, at follow-up mothers who mediated were significantly less satisfied than were mothers who litigated, but selective attrition may account for these differences. The psychological adjustment of mothers and fathers was not significantly different between settlement groups at Time 2, but mothers in both groups reported less satisfaction with dispute settlement and less dysphoria at Time 2 than they had reported at Time 1.
对随机分配通过调解或对抗程序解决监护权纠纷的家庭进行了为期一年的随访研究。与第一次报告一致,在第二次随访时,通过调解解决纠纷的父亲比通过诉讼解决纠纷的父亲满意度要高得多。通过调解解决纠纷的父亲对子女抚养令的遵守情况也更好。与预测相反,父亲更高的满意度和更好的遵守情况并没有使参与调解的母亲的满意度提高。与第一次随访不同,在后续随访中,参与调解的母亲比通过诉讼解决纠纷的母亲满意度明显更低,但选择性损耗可能是造成这些差异的原因。在第二次随访时,不同解决方式组的父母心理调适情况没有显著差异,但两组母亲在第二次随访时对纠纷解决的满意度和烦躁情绪均低于第一次随访时的报告。