Ochs E P, Meana M, Paré L, Mah K, Binik Y M
Clinical Psychology graduate program at McGill University.
J Sex Marital Ther. 1994 Summer;20(2):86-102. doi: 10.1080/00926239408403420.
In an ongoing research program investigating the utility of Sexpert, an expert computer system designed to counsel couples about their sexual relationships, we tested whether sexually active couples' attitudes concerning computerized sexual counseling could be affected by interacting with Sexpert. Eighty-one young heterosexual couples drawn from the university and general community were assigned to one of three sources of feedback about couple sexual functioning (Sexpert, a video, a self-help book) or a control condition. Attitudes toward all counseling sources used in the study were assessed through semantic differential and similarity-dissimilarity questionnaires. Subjects in the Sexpert condition showed significant improvements in their attitudes toward computerized sexual counseling and evaluated Sexpert significantly better and more similar to a human therapist as a result of exposure. Subjects in the other three conditions showed no significant changes in attitudes. This study provides strong evidence for the acceptability of a computerized sex-expert system.
在一项正在进行的研究项目中,我们对Sexpert(一个旨在为伴侣提供性关系咨询的专家计算机系统)的效用进行了调查,测试了性活跃伴侣与Sexpert互动后,他们对计算机化性咨询的态度是否会受到影响。从大学和普通社区招募了81对年轻异性恋伴侣,将他们分配到关于伴侣性功能的三种反馈来源之一(Sexpert、视频、自助书籍)或一个对照条件组。通过语义差异和相似性-不相似性问卷对研究中使用的所有咨询来源的态度进行了评估。接触Sexpert的受试者对计算机化性咨询的态度有显著改善,并且由于接触,他们对Sexpert的评价明显更好,而且认为它与人类治疗师更相似。其他三个条件组的受试者态度没有显著变化。这项研究为计算机化性专家系统的可接受性提供了有力证据。