Blank S G, Helseth G, Pickering T G, West J E, August P
Cardiovascular Center, New York (NY) Hospital-Cornell University Medical Center 10021.
Hypertension. 1994 Aug;24(2):234-40. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.24.2.234.
Controversy exists concerning the most accurate method for defining diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy. Both disappearance (phase V) and muffling (phase IV) of Korotkoff sounds have been advocated. We previously reported an objective noninvasive method for measuring blood pressure, called K2 analysis, which in nonpregnant subjects was not different from intra-arterial diastolic blood pressure and was more accurate than the auscultatory technique. For determination of the relation of diastolic blood pressure (using K2) in pregnancy with muffling and disappearance of Korotkoff sounds, 58 women (42 hypertensive, 16 normotensive) underwent 556 blood pressure evaluations in the supine position at various stages of pregnancy. K2 analysis was compared with simultaneous auscultation by two observers, A1 (n = 461 observations; 364 hypertensive, 97 normotensive) and A2 (n = 415; 316 hypertensive, 99 normotensive). Overall, muffling was detected by observer A1 52.9% (244/461) and by observer A2 44.3% (184/415) of the time. When evaluated by clinical classification, muffling was found by both observers to be present less often in the hypertensive group (A1: 47.5%; A2: 37.3%) compared with the normotensive group (A1: 73.2%; A2: 66.7%) (P < .0001). When both observers were present (n = 348), they agreed that muffling was present only 112 times. Disappearance of sound was detected by both observers 98.3% (A1: 453/461; A2: 408/415) of the time. Muffling overestimated K2 diastolic pressure by 7 to 10 mm Hg, whereas there was no statistically significant difference between disappearance and K2 diastolic pressure for hypertensive subjects and a 2.5-mm Hg underestimation of K2 diastolic pressure for normotensive subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
关于孕期定义舒张压的最准确方法存在争议。有人主张采用柯氏音消失(第V期)和减弱(第IV期)这两种方法。我们之前报道了一种名为K2分析的客观无创血压测量方法,在非孕期受试者中,该方法测得的血压与动脉内舒张压无异,且比听诊技术更准确。为了确定孕期舒张压(采用K2分析)与柯氏音减弱及消失之间的关系,58名女性(42名高血压患者,16名血压正常者)在孕期不同阶段进行了556次仰卧位血压评估。将K2分析结果与两名观察者(A1,n = 461次观察;364名高血压患者,97名血压正常者;A2,n = 415次观察;316名高血压患者,99名血压正常者)同时进行听诊的结果进行比较。总体而言,观察者A1在52.9%(244/461)的观察中检测到柯氏音减弱,观察者A2在44.3%(184/415)的观察中检测到。按临床分类评估时,与血压正常组(A1:73.2%;A2:66.7%)相比,两名观察者均发现高血压组中柯氏音减弱出现的频率更低(A1:47.5%;A2:37.3%)(P <.0001)。当两名观察者都在场时(n = 348),他们仅在112次观察中都认为存在柯氏音减弱。两名观察者在98.3%(A1:453/461;A2:408/415)的观察中检测到柯氏音消失。柯氏音减弱使K2舒张压高估7至10毫米汞柱,而对于高血压患者,柯氏音消失与K2舒张压之间无统计学显著差异,对于血压正常者,K2舒张压被低估2.5毫米汞柱。(摘要截选至250词)