• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在测量血压正常的孕妇血压时,手动听诊法与自动示波法之间的一致性较差。

There is poor agreement between manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods for the measurement of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women.

作者信息

Pomini F, Scavo M, Ferrazzani S, De Carolis S, Caruso A, Mancuso S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, A. Gemelli'Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, School of Medicine and Surgery, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Med. 2001 Dec;10(6):398-403. doi: 10.1080/714052781.

DOI:10.1080/714052781
PMID:11798450
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the agreement between manual auscultatory arterial blood pressure values and the values obtained by an automated oscillometric device in normotensive pregnant patients.

METHODS

Arterial blood pressure was determined concomitantly by a Dinamap 1846 sx/p device and by one observer (I, IV, V Korotkoff sounds) blinded to the Dinamap values. Agreement between methods was tested and graded according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society.

RESULTS

A total of 490 observations were performed. Differences were observed between the manual auscultatory method and the Dinamap method. In monitoring normotensive pregnant patients with a Dinamap device, an error was made of about 10 mmHg in 22% of the observations for systolic arterial blood pressure (BP); in 11% for diastolic arterial BP (IV sound); and in 15% for diastolic arterial BP (V sound). According to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the overall grade reached was 'C'.

CONCLUSIONS

Although an underestimation of only 10 mmHg was shown, this can be of great importance in delaying a correct diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. The assessment of agreement of the Dinamap 1846 sx/p device in hypertensive pregnant patients should also be determined. A prospective study could be useful to determine the effectiveness of an automated device in detecting hypertensive disease in pregnancy.

摘要

目的

评估血压正常的孕妇手动听诊法测得的动脉血压值与自动示波装置测得的值之间的一致性。

方法

使用Dinamap 1846 sx/p设备并由一名对Dinamap值不知情的观察者(听诊第I、IV、V期柯氏音)同时测定动脉血压。根据英国高血压学会的方案对两种方法之间的一致性进行测试和分级。

结果

共进行了490次观察。手动听诊法和Dinamap法之间存在差异。在用Dinamap设备监测血压正常的孕妇时,22%的收缩期动脉血压(BP)观察值误差约为10 mmHg;11%的舒张期动脉血压(第IV期柯氏音)观察值误差约为10 mmHg;15%的舒张期动脉血压(第V期柯氏音)观察值误差约为10 mmHg。根据英国高血压学会的方案,总体分级为“C”级。

结论

尽管仅显示出10 mmHg的低估,但这在延迟子痫前期的正确诊断方面可能非常重要。还应确定Dinamap 1846 sx/p设备在高血压孕妇中的一致性评估。一项前瞻性研究可能有助于确定自动装置在检测妊娠高血压疾病方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
There is poor agreement between manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods for the measurement of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women.在测量血压正常的孕妇血压时,手动听诊法与自动示波法之间的一致性较差。
J Matern Fetal Med. 2001 Dec;10(6):398-403. doi: 10.1080/714052781.
2
Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.通过听诊法和示波法测得的血压水平差异。
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Aug;144(8):911-4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150320075031.
3
Automated blood pressure measurement devices: a potential source of morbidity in preeclampsia?自动血压测量设备:子痫前期发病的潜在来源?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;170(5 Pt 1):1303-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70146-6.
4
Inflationary oscillometry provides accurate measurement of blood pressure in pre-eclampsia.充气振荡法可准确测量子痫前期的血压。
BJOG. 2002 Oct;109(10):1143-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01487.x.
5
Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.听诊式混合血压计和自动血压计与汞柱式血压计在高血压和血压正常孕妇中的比较:平行验证研究。
J Hypertens. 2015 Mar;33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000420.
6
Baseline check of blood pressure readings of an automated device in severe pre-eclampsia and healthy normotensive pregnancy.重度子痫前期和健康血压正常妊娠中自动设备血压读数的基线检查。
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Apr;12:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
7
Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.Dinamap 1846 XT自动血压监测仪的准确性。
J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Sep;16(9):647-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001463.
8
Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.根据英国高血压学会方案对成人使用的迪纳迈普ProCare监护仪进行临床评估。
Blood Press Monit. 2007 Feb;12(1):51-5. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280858b73.
9
Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.妊娠期和子痫前期示波法血压监测的准确性
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Mar;104(3):350-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11467.x.
10
Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.三种示波法血压测量设备在儿童中相对于听诊法汞柱血压计的验证。
Blood Press Monit. 2006 Oct;11(5):281-91. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000209082.09623.b4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Accuracy of the Withings BPM Connect for Self-Blood Pressure Measurements in Pregnancy and Pre-Eclampsia: Validation According to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.Withings BPM Connect 在妊娠和子痫前期自我血压测量中的临床准确性:根据医疗器械促进协会/欧洲高血压学会/国际标准化组织通用标准进行验证。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Mar 26;18:181-189. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S351313. eCollection 2022.
2
Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.人类血压测量:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Hypertension. 2019 May;73(5):e35-e66. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087.
3
Clinical accuracy of the Omron M3 Comfort and the Omron Evolv for self-blood pressure measurements in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia - validation according to the Universal Standard Protocol.欧姆龙M3舒适型和欧姆龙Evolv用于孕期和先兆子痫患者自测血压的临床准确性——根据通用标准方案进行验证
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018 Aug 31;14:189-197. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S165524. eCollection 2018.
4
Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies.妊娠期血压测量设备的准确性:验证研究的系统评价。
Hypertension. 2018 Feb;71(2):326-335. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10295. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
5
Estimate of nocturnal blood pressure and detection of non-dippers based on clinical or ambulatory monitoring in the inpatient setting.基于临床或动态监测在住院环境下估算夜间血压和发现非杓型血压。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 May 21;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-37.
6
Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management.非侵入性和逐搏动脉血压监测对术中血流动力学管理的影响。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Apr;26(2):133-40. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9344-2. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
7
Accuracy of mean arterial pressure and blood pressure measurements in predicting pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis.平均动脉压和血压测量在预测子痫前期中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1117-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39540.522049.BE. Epub 2008 May 14.