• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Statutory requirements for disclosure of breast cancer treatment alternatives.

作者信息

Nayfield S G, Bongiovanni G C, Alciati M H, Fischer R A, Bergner L

机构信息

Community Oncology and Rehabilitation Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Aug 17;86(16):1202-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.16.1202.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/86.16.1202
PMID:8040887
Abstract

Therapeutic options for breast cancer, particularly for early-stage disease, and increased patient participation in medical decision-making have oriented state legislatures toward ensuring that women with breast cancer have adequate information about treatment alternatives. Currently, 18 states have enacted statutes regarding physician disclosure of treatment alternatives to breast cancer patients. This paper reviews these statutes in the context of the requirements imposed on the physician as health care provider and the content of medical information presented to the patient as a consequence of the laws. State statutes were identified through the National Cancer Institute's State Cancer Legislative Database, and the statutory requirements were analyzed. For statutes requiring development of a written summary of treatment alternatives, the most recent summary was obtained through the responsible state agency, and informational content was analyzed for relevance to treatment decisions in early-stage disease. As a group, these laws address informed consent for treatment, physician behavior within the patient-physician relationship, and the medical information upon which treatment decisions are based. Individual statutes vary in the scope of the issues addressed, particularly in the responsibility placed on physicians, and treatment option summaries developed in response to this legislation vary widely in content and scope. Despite broad implications of these statutes in oncology practice, little is known about their effects on breast cancer care. Additional research is needed to define the impact of these statutes on breast cancer care, as such legislation is considered by other states for this and other diseases.

摘要

相似文献

1
Statutory requirements for disclosure of breast cancer treatment alternatives.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Aug 17;86(16):1202-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.16.1202.
2
Informed consent and disclosure in the physician-patient relationship: expanding obligations for physicians in the United States.医患关系中的知情同意与信息披露:美国医生义务的扩展
Med Law. 1995;14(5-6):429-44.
3
Informed consent: law, clinical reality, and the role of the family physician.知情同意:法律、临床现实及家庭医生的作用
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992 Mar-Apr;5(2):207-14.
4
Divided loyalties: a physician's responsibilities in an information age.忠诚分歧:信息时代医生的责任
Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):817-26. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90280-7.
5
Resist and redirect: physicians respond to breast cancer informed consent legislation.
Women Health. 1997;26(1):85-105. doi: 10.1300/J013v26n01_06.
6
The patient's right to information in Japan--legal rules and doctor's opinions.日本患者的知情权——法律规定与医生观点
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(9):1007-16. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90158-9.
7
Dense breast notification: anatomy, imaging, and patient awareness.致密乳腺告知:解剖学、影像学及患者认知
Radiol Technol. 2014 Sep-Oct;86(1):17-22.
8
A physician's duty to inform of newly developed therapy.医生告知新研发疗法的职责。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1990 Spring;6:43-58.
9
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
10
Disclosure standards and informed consent.披露标准与知情同意。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1981 Summer;6(2):255-84. doi: 10.1215/03616878-6-2-255.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissecting autonomy in a resource-constrained setting: a descriptive qualitative study of women's decisions on the surgical treatment of early breast cancer in northern Sri Lanka.剖析资源受限环境下的自主权:对斯里兰卡北部女性关于早期乳腺癌手术治疗决策的描述性定性研究
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2494396. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2494396. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Moulding Breasts, Shaping Lives: Propagating Oncoplastic Surgery.塑造乳房,改变生活:推广肿瘤整形手术。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):221-227. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02071-0. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Modified Radical Mastectomy vs Breast-Conserving Surgery: Current Clinical Practice in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer at a Corporate Tertiary Cancer Center in India.
改良根治性乳房切除术与保乳手术:印度一家企业三级癌症中心早期乳腺癌女性患者的当前临床实践
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(2):322-328. doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01457-8. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Theoretical Perspectives for Why It Works and For Whom.医疗保健中的共享决策制定:为什么它有效以及对谁有效的理论视角。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Aug;42(6):755-764. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211058068. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
5
Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a study of the NCCN.医疗机构之间治疗乳腺癌方式的差异:NCCN 的研究
Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):339-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182263bb0.
6
Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust.乳腺癌辅助治疗的使用不足:患者的知识、信念及对医疗的不信任。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5160-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9773. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
7
Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go?乳腺癌治疗风险与益处相关知识方面的种族/族裔差异:就医地点重要吗?
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1366-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00843.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
8
Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer.与患者参与乳腺癌手术治疗决策相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
9
Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.并非所有患者都希望参与决策制定。一项关于公众偏好的全国性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
10
Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer.基于人群样本的乳腺癌女性对手术结果及决策过程的满意度
Health Serv Res. 2005 Jun;40(3):745-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00383.x.