Hawley Sarah T, Lantz Paula M, Janz Nancy K, Salem Barbara, Morrow Monica, Schwartz Kendra, Liu Lihua, Katz Steven J
Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, United States.
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
To evaluate factors associated with women's reported level of involvement in breast cancer surgical treatment decision making, and the factors associated with the match between actual and preferred involvement in this decision.
Survey data from breast cancer patients in Detroit and Los Angeles was merged with surgeon data for an analytic dataset of 1101 patients and 277 surgeons. Decisional involvement and the match between actual and preferred amount of involvement were analyzed as three-level dependent variables using multinomial logistic regression controlling for clustering within surgeons. Independent variables included patient demographic and clinical factors, surgeon demographic and practice factors, cancer program designation, and two measures of patient-surgeon communication.
We found variation in women's actual decisional involvement and match between actual and preferred involvement. Women with a surgeon-based or patient-based (versus shared) decision were significantly (p < or = 0.05) younger. Women who had too little decisional involvement (versus the right amount) were younger, while women with too much involvement had less education. Patient-surgeon communication variables were significantly associated with both involvement and match, and higher surgeon volume as associated with too little involvement.
Patient factors and patient-surgeon communication influence women's perception of their involvement in breast cancer surgical treatment decision making.
Decision tools are needed across surgeons and practice settings to elicit patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decisions for breast cancer.
评估与女性报告的乳腺癌手术治疗决策参与程度相关的因素,以及与实际参与和期望参与该决策之间匹配度相关的因素。
将底特律和洛杉矶乳腺癌患者的调查数据与外科医生数据合并,形成一个包含1101名患者和277名外科医生的分析数据集。使用多项逻辑回归分析决策参与度以及实际参与量与期望参与量之间的匹配度,将其作为三级因变量,并控制外科医生内部的聚类情况。自变量包括患者的人口统计学和临床因素、外科医生的人口统计学和执业因素、癌症项目指定,以及两种患者与外科医生沟通的测量指标。
我们发现女性在实际决策参与度以及实际参与度与期望参与度的匹配度方面存在差异。基于外科医生主导或患者主导(而非共同主导)决策的女性明显(p≤0.05)更年轻。决策参与度过低(与适当参与度相比)的女性更年轻,而参与度过高的女性受教育程度较低。患者与外科医生的沟通变量与参与度和匹配度均显著相关,外科医生手术量较高与参与度过低相关。
患者因素以及患者与外科医生的沟通会影响女性对自身参与乳腺癌手术治疗决策的认知。
需要在外科医生和不同执业环境中使用决策工具,以了解患者对参与乳腺癌治疗决策的偏好。