Yoder A D
Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Peabody Museum, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994 May;94(1):25-46. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330940104.
An examination of previous morphological and molecular studies of strepsirhine systematics suggests a conflict between the two types of data. Cladistic analyses of morphological data have indicated that the Malagasy primate family Cheirogaleidae is the sister taxon of the Afro-Asian lorisiforms and that together, cheirogaleids and lorisiforms comprise a monophyletic clade that excludes the Malagasy lemuriforms. Molecular studies, on the other hand, have consistently found that cheirogaleids and lemuriforms together are monophyletic to the exclusion of lorisiforms. Both types of studies, however, have suffered from methodological weaknesses: the morphological studies looked at too few characters and the molecular studies looked at too few taxa. This study examines a large and diverse morphological data set as well as molecular data from a comprehensive sample of strepsirhine taxa. The data sets are considered independently and jointly. When they are analyzed independently, the morphological data give weak support, and the molecular data strong support, to the hypothesis of Malagasy primate monophyly. When the two data sets are combined in a single analysis, the results are decisive. The "total evidence" approach yields compelling support to the hypothesis that cheirogaleids and remaining Malagasy lemuriforms comprise a monophyletic assemblage that excludes lorisiforms.
对先前关于狐猴型灵长类系统发育的形态学和分子研究进行考察后发现,这两类数据之间存在冲突。对形态学数据的分支分析表明,马达加斯加灵长类动物科倭狐猴科是亚非懒猴型灵长类动物的姐妹分类单元,倭狐猴科和懒猴型灵长类动物共同构成一个单系类群,该类群不包括马达加斯加狐猴型灵长类动物。另一方面,分子研究一直发现,倭狐猴科和狐猴型灵长类动物共同构成一个单系类群,将懒猴型灵长类动物排除在外。然而,这两类研究都存在方法上的弱点:形态学研究考察的特征太少,分子研究考察的分类单元太少。本研究考察了一个庞大且多样的形态学数据集以及来自狐猴型灵长类分类单元综合样本的分子数据。这些数据集被单独和联合考虑。当对它们进行单独分析时,形态学数据对马达加斯加灵长类动物单系性的假设支持较弱,而分子数据支持较强。当将这两个数据集合并在一次分析中时,结果是决定性的。“总证据”方法为倭狐猴科和其余马达加斯加狐猴型灵长类动物构成一个排除懒猴型灵长类动物的单系组合这一假设提供了令人信服的支持。