Ruvolo M
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994 May;94(1):89-113. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330940108.
Molecular evolutionary processes modify DNA over time, creating both newly derived substitutions shared by related descendant lineages (phylogenetic signal) and "false" similarities which confound phylogenetic reconstruction (homoplasy). However, some types of DNA regions, for example those containing tandem duplicate repeats, are preferentially subject to homoplasy-inducing processes such as sporadically occurring concerted evolution and DNA insertion/deletion. This added level of homoplasic "noise" can make DNA regions with repeats less reliable in phylogenetic reconstruction than those without repeats. Most molecular datasets which distinguish among African hominoids support a human-chimpanzee clade; the most notable exception is from the involucrin gene. However, phylogenetic resolution supporting a chimpanzee-gorilla clade is based entirely on involucrin DNA repeat regions. This is problematic because (1) involucrin repeats are difficult to align, and published alignments are contradictory; (2) involucrin repeats are subject to DNA insertion/deletion; (3) gorillas are polymorphic in that some do not have repeats reported to be synapomorphies linking chimpanzees and gorillas. Gene tree/species tree conflicts can occur due to the sorting of ancestrally polymorphic alleles during speciation. Because hominoid females transfer between groups, mitochondrial and nuclear gene flow occur to the same extent, and the probability of conflict between mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees is theoretically low. When hominoid intraspecific mitochondrial variability is taken into account [based on cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII) gene sequences], humans and chimpanzees are most closely related, showing the same relative degree of separation from gorillas as when single individuals representing species are analyzed. Conflicting molecular phylogenies can be explained in terms of molecular evolutionary processes and sorting of ancient polymorphisms. This perspective can enhance our understanding of hominoid molecular phylogenies.
随着时间的推移,分子进化过程会改变DNA,既产生相关后代谱系共有的新衍生替换(系统发育信号),也会产生混淆系统发育重建的“虚假”相似性(平行进化)。然而,某些类型的DNA区域,例如那些包含串联重复序列的区域,优先经历导致平行进化的过程,如偶尔发生的协同进化和DNA插入/缺失。这种额外的平行进化“噪声”水平会使含有重复序列的DNA区域在系统发育重建中比没有重复序列的区域更不可靠。大多数区分非洲类人猿的分子数据集支持人类 - 黑猩猩分支;最显著的例外是来自内披蛋白基因。然而,支持黑猩猩 - 大猩猩分支的系统发育分辨率完全基于内披蛋白DNA重复区域。这存在问题,因为:(1)内披蛋白重复序列难以比对,且已发表的比对结果相互矛盾;(2)内披蛋白重复序列会发生DNA插入/缺失;(3)大猩猩具有多态性,因为有些大猩猩没有被报道为连接黑猩猩和大猩猩的共有衍征的重复序列。在物种形成过程中,祖先多态性等位基因的分选可能导致基因树/物种树冲突。由于类人猿雌性在群体间转移,线粒体和核基因流的程度相同,理论上线粒体和核基因树之间冲突的概率较低。当考虑类人猿种内线粒体变异性(基于细胞色素氧化酶亚基II(COII)基因序列)时,人类和黑猩猩关系最为密切,与大猩猩的相对分离程度与分析代表物种的单个个体时相同。相互冲突的分子系统发育可以用分子进化过程和古老多态性的分选来解释。这种观点可以增强我们对类人猿分子系统发育的理解。