• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用灵长类β-珠蛋白基因簇的其他序列对非洲类人猿三分法进行重新审视。

Reexamination of the African hominoid trichotomy with additional sequences from the primate beta-globin gene cluster.

作者信息

Bailey W J, Hayasaka K, Skinner C G, Kehoe S, Sieu L C, Slightom J L, Goodman M

机构信息

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201.

出版信息

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1992 Jun;1(2):97-135. doi: 10.1016/1055-7903(92)90024-b.

DOI:10.1016/1055-7903(92)90024-b
PMID:1342932
Abstract

Additional DNA sequence information from a range of primates, including 13.7 kb from pygmy chimpanzee (Pan paniscus), was added to data sets of beta-globin gene cluster sequence alignments that span the gamma 1, gamma 2, and psi eta loci and their flanking and intergenic regions. This enlarged body of data was used to address the issue of whether the ancestral separations of gorilla, chimpanzee, and human lineages resulted from only one trichotomous branching or from two dichotomous branching events. The degree of divergence, corrected for superimposed substitutions, seen in the beta-globin gene cluster between human alleles is about a third to a half that observed between two species of chimpanzee and about a fourth that between human and chimpanzee. The divergence either between chimpanzee and gorilla or between human and gorilla is slightly greater than that between human and chimpanzee, suggesting that the ancestral separations resulted from two closely spaced dichotomous branchings. Maximum parsimony analysis further strengthened the evidence that humans and chimpanzees share the longest common ancestry. Support for this human-chimpanzee clade is statistically significant at P = 0.002 over a human-gorilla clade or a chimpanzee-gorilla clade. An analysis of expected and observed homoplasy revealed that the number of sequence changes uniquely shared by human and chimpanzee lineages is too large to be attributed to homoplasy. Molecular clock calculations that accommodated lineage variations in rates of molecular evolution yielded hominoid branching times that ranged from 17-19 million years ago (MYA) for the separation of gibbon from the other hominoids to 5-7 MYA for the separation of chimpanzees from humans. Based on the relatively late dates and mounting corroborative evidence from unlinked nuclear genes and mitochondrial DNA for the close sister grouping of humans and chimpanzees, a cladistic classification would place all apes and humans in the same family. Within this family, gibbons would be placed in one subfamily and all other extant hominoids in another subfamily. The later subfamily would be divided into a tribe for orangutans and another tribe for gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans. Finally, gorillas would be placed in one subtribe with chimpanzees and humans in another, although this last division is not as strongly supported as the other divisions.

摘要

一系列灵长类动物的额外DNA序列信息,包括来自倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)的13.7 kb,被添加到跨越γ1、γ2和ψη基因座及其侧翼和基因间区域的β-珠蛋白基因簇序列比对数据集中。这一扩大的数据体被用于解决大猩猩、黑猩猩和人类谱系的祖先分离是仅由一次三分分支还是由两次二分分支事件导致的问题。在人类等位基因之间的β-珠蛋白基因簇中观察到的,经叠加替换校正后的分歧程度,约为两种黑猩猩之间观察到的分歧程度的三分之一到一半,约为人类与黑猩猩之间分歧程度的四分之一。黑猩猩与大猩猩之间或人类与大猩猩之间的分歧略大于人类与黑猩猩之间的分歧,这表明祖先分离是由两次紧密间隔的二分分支导致的。最大简约分析进一步强化了人类和黑猩猩拥有最长共同祖先的证据。在P = 0.002时,相对于人类-大猩猩分支或黑猩猩-大猩猩分支,对人类-黑猩猩分支的支持在统计学上具有显著性。对预期和观察到的同塑性的分析表明,人类和黑猩猩谱系独特共享的序列变化数量太大,不能归因于同塑性。考虑到分子进化速率的谱系变化的分子钟计算得出,类人猿的分支时间范围从长臂猿与其他类人猿分离的1700 - 1900万年前(MYA)到黑猩猩与人类分离的500 - 700万年前。基于相对较晚的日期以及来自不连锁核基因和线粒体DNA的越来越多的确凿证据支持人类和黑猩猩为近亲姐妹群,一种分支分类法将所有猿类和人类归为同一科。在这个科内,长臂猿将被置于一个亚科,所有其他现存类人猿置于另一个亚科。后一个亚科将分为一个猩猩部落和另一个大猩猩、黑猩猩和人类部落。最后,大猩猩将被置于一个亚部落,黑猩猩和人类置于另一个亚部落,尽管最后这个划分不像其他划分那样得到强有力的支持。

相似文献

1
Reexamination of the African hominoid trichotomy with additional sequences from the primate beta-globin gene cluster.利用灵长类β-珠蛋白基因簇的其他序列对非洲类人猿三分法进行重新审视。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1992 Jun;1(2):97-135. doi: 10.1016/1055-7903(92)90024-b.
2
Molecular evolution of the psi eta-globin gene locus: gibbon phylogeny and the hominoid slowdown.ψη-珠蛋白基因座的分子进化:长臂猿系统发育与人猿超科进化减速
Mol Biol Evol. 1991 Mar;8(2):155-84. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040641.
3
Evolution of the primate beta-globin gene region: nucleotide sequence of the delta-beta-globin intergenic region of gorilla and phylogenetic relationships between African apes and man.灵长类β-珠蛋白基因区域的进化:大猩猩δ-β-珠蛋白基因间隔区的核苷酸序列以及非洲猿与人类之间的系统发育关系。
J Mol Evol. 1992 Jan;34(1):17-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00163849.
4
Resolution of the African hominoid trichotomy by use of a mitochondrial gene sequence.利用线粒体基因序列解决非洲类人猿的三分问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 15;88(4):1570-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1570.
5
Molecular systematics of higher primates: genealogical relations and classification.高等灵长类动物的分子系统学:谱系关系与分类
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(20):7627-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.20.7627.
6
Molecular evidence on primate phylogeny from DNA sequences.来自DNA序列的灵长类系统发育的分子证据。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994 May;94(1):3-24. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330940103.
7
Primate evolution at the DNA level and a classification of hominoids.DNA 水平上的灵长类动物进化与人猿总科的分类
J Mol Evol. 1990 Mar;30(3):260-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02099995.
8
Molecular phylogeny of the family of apes and humans.猿类和人类家族的分子系统发育
Genome. 1989;31(1):316-35. doi: 10.1139/g89-050.
9
Primate eta-globin DNA sequences and man's place among the great apes.灵长类动物的η-珠蛋白DNA序列与人类在大猩猩中的地位。
Nature. 1986;319(6050):234-8. doi: 10.1038/319234a0.
10
Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees.人类与其他类人猿之间的基因组差异以及人类和黑猩猩共同祖先的有效种群大小。
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Feb;68(2):444-56. doi: 10.1086/318206. Epub 2001 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary history of chimpanzees inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.从完整的线粒体基因组推断黑猩猩的进化历史。
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Jan;28(1):615-23. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq227. Epub 2010 Aug 28.
2
Colloquium paper: phylogenomic evidence of adaptive evolution in the ancestry of humans.学术研讨会论文:人类祖先适应性进化的系统基因组学证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):8918-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914626107. Epub 2010 May 5.
3
Superior olivary complex organization and cytoarchitecture may be correlated with function and catarrhine primate phylogeny.
上橄榄复合体的组织结构和细胞结构可能与功能及狭鼻猴灵长类动物的系统发育相关。
Brain Struct Funct. 2009 Sep;213(4-5):489-97. doi: 10.1007/s00429-008-0201-5. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
4
Differential loss of embryonic globin genes during the radiation of placental mammals.胎盘哺乳动物辐射过程中胚胎珠蛋白基因的差异丢失。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 2;105(35):12950-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804392105. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
5
Implications of natural selection in shaping 99.4% nonsynonymous DNA identity between humans and chimpanzees: enlarging genus Homo.自然选择对人类与黑猩猩之间99.4%的非同义DNA一致性形成的影响:扩大人属。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 10;100(12):7181-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1232172100. Epub 2003 May 23.
6
High levels of Y-chromosome nucleotide diversity in the genus Pan.黑猩猩属中Y染色体核苷酸多样性水平较高。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):43-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012364999. Epub 2001 Dec 26.
7
The genomic record of Humankind's evolutionary roots.人类进化根源的基因组记录。
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):31-9. doi: 10.1086/302218.
8
Pattern and timing of evolutionary divergences among hominoids based on analyses of complete mtDNAs.基于完整线粒体DNA分析的类人猿进化分歧模式与时间
J Mol Evol. 1996 Dec;43(6):650-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02202113.
9
A population genetic study of the evolution of SINEs. II. Sequence evolution under the master copy model.SINEs进化的群体遗传学研究。II. 主拷贝模型下的序列进化
Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):1033-42. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.1033.
10
Reduction of two functional gamma-globin genes to one: an evolutionary trend in New World monkeys (infraorder Platyrrhini).功能性γ-珠蛋白基因从两个减少到一个:新大陆猴(阔鼻下目)的一种进化趋势。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 25;93(13):6510-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6510.