Buckle A M, Schreiber G, Fersht A R
Cambridge Centre for Protein Engineering, Medical Research Council Centre, U.K.
Biochemistry. 1994 Aug 2;33(30):8878-89. doi: 10.1021/bi00196a004.
We have solved, refined, and analyzed the 2.0-å resolution crystal structure of a 1:1 complex between the bacterial ribonuclease, barnase, and a Cys-->Ala(40,82) double mutant of its intracellular polypeptide inhibitor, barstar. Barstar inhibits barnase by sterically blocking the active site with a helix and adjacent loop segment. Almost half of the 14 hydrogen bonds between barnase and barstar involve two charged residues, and a third involve one charged partner. The electrostatic contribution to the overall binding energy is considerably greater than for other protein-protein interactions. Consequently, the very high rate constant for the barnase-barstar association (10(8) s-1 M-1) is most likely due to electrostatic steering effects. The barnase active-site residue His102 is located in a pocket on the surface of barstar, and its hydrogen bonds with Asp39 and Gly31 residues of barstar are directly responsible for the pH dependence of barnase-barstar binding. There is a high degree of complementarity both of the shape and of the charge of the interacting surfaces, but neither is perfect. The surface complementarity is slightly poorer than in protease-inhibitor complexes but a little better than in antibody-antigen interactions. However, since the burial of solvent in the barnase-barstar interface improves the fit significantly by filling in the majority of gaps, as well as stabilizing unfavorable electrostatic interactions, its role seems to be more important than in other protein-protein complexes. The electrostatic interactions between barnase and barstar are very similar to those between barnase and the tetranucleotide d(CGAC). In the barnase-barstar complex, the two phosphate-binding sites in the barnase active site are occupied by Asp39 and Gly43 of barstar. However, barstar has no equivalent for a guanine base of an RNA substrate, resulting in the occupation of the guanine recognition site in the barnase-barstar complex by nine ordered water molecules. Upon barnase-barstar binding, entropy losses resulting from the immobilization of segments of the protein chain and the energetic costs of conformational changes are minimized due to the essentially preformed active site of barnase. However, a certain degree of flexibility within the barnase active site is required to allow for the structural differences between barnase-barstar binding and barnase-RNA binding. A comparison between the bound and the free barstar structure shows that the overall structural response to barnase-binding is significant. This response can be best described as outwardly oriented, rigid-body movements of the four alpha-helices of barstar, resulting in the structure of bound barstar being somewhat expanded.
我们解析、优化并分析了细菌核糖核酸酶巴那斯酶(barnase)与其细胞内多肽抑制剂巴丝塔(barstar)的Cys→Ala(40,82)双突变体形成的1:1复合物的2.0埃分辨率晶体结构。巴丝塔通过一个螺旋和相邻的环段在空间上阻断活性位点来抑制巴那斯酶。巴那斯酶与巴丝塔之间14个氢键中几乎一半涉及两个带电荷的残基,另有三分之一涉及一个带电荷的伙伴。静电作用对总结合能的贡献远大于其他蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用。因此,巴那斯酶-巴丝塔缔合的极高速率常数(10⁸ s⁻¹ M⁻¹)很可能归因于静电导向效应。巴那斯酶活性位点残基His102位于巴丝塔表面的一个口袋中,它与巴丝塔的Asp39和Gly31残基形成的氢键直接决定了巴那斯酶-巴丝塔结合的pH依赖性。相互作用表面的形状和电荷都具有高度互补性,但都并非完美。表面互补性略逊于蛋白酶-抑制剂复合物,但略优于抗体-抗原相互作用。然而,由于巴那斯酶-巴丝塔界面处溶剂的埋藏通过填补大部分间隙显著改善了契合度,同时稳定了不利的静电相互作用,其作用似乎比其他蛋白质-蛋白质复合物更为重要。巴那斯酶与巴丝塔之间的静电相互作用与巴那斯酶与四核苷酸d(CGAC)之间的静电相互作用非常相似。在巴那斯酶-巴丝塔复合物中,巴那斯酶活性位点的两个磷酸结合位点被巴丝塔的Asp39和Gly43占据。然而,巴丝塔没有与RNA底物鸟嘌呤碱基等效的部分,导致在巴那斯酶-巴丝塔复合物中鸟嘌呤识别位点被9个有序水分子占据。巴那斯酶-巴丝塔结合时,由于巴那斯酶的活性位点基本已预先形成,蛋白质链片段固定导致的熵损失以及构象变化的能量成本被最小化。然而,巴那斯酶活性位点内需要一定程度的灵活性,以适应巴那斯酶-巴丝塔结合与巴那斯酶-RNA结合之间的结构差异。结合态与游离态巴丝塔结构的比较表明,对巴那斯酶结合的整体结构响应显著。这种响应最好描述为巴丝塔的四个α螺旋向外的刚体运动,导致结合态巴丝塔的结构有所扩展。