Tayag J C, Punongbayan R S
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Quezon City.
Disasters. 1994 Mar;18(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1994.tb00281.x.
Considerable progress has been made in volcanic disaster mitigation in the Philippines during the last four decades, since the devastating Hibok-Hibok eruption in 1951 and the establishment of the Commission on Volcanology (COMVOL), the forerunner of the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS) in 1952. The management of the Pinatubo Volcano eruption crisis of 1991-92 marks the highest point in the development of volcanic disaster mitigation in the country. State-of-the-art volcano monitoring techniques and instruments were applied; the eruption was accurately predicted; hazards zonation maps were prepared and disseminated a month before the violent explosions; an alert and warning system was designed and implemented; and the disaster response machinery was mobilized on time. The unprecedented magnitude and lingering nature of the hazards, however, and their widespread, long-term impacts have sorely tested the capability of the country's volcanic disaster mitigation systems. In particular, the lahar threat has triggered controversies and put decision makers in a dilemma of choosing between adaptive versus confrontational/control approaches. At least three strategies have been articulated and adopted in varying degrees and forms: (1) the establishment of a lahar monitoring-warning-evacuation system to deal with the lahar problem on an emergency basis; (2) relocation of settlements from the hazard zones; and (3) installation of engineering countermeasures to control/divert the lahar flows and protect settlements. A combination of the three appears to be the best, but the most effective and least costly mix remains to be determined.
自1951年希博克火山毁灭性喷发以及1952年火山学委员会(COMVOL)成立以来,在过去的四十年里,菲律宾在减轻火山灾害方面取得了相当大的进展。火山学委员会是菲律宾火山与地震研究所(PHIVOLCS)的前身。1991 - 1992年皮纳图博火山喷发危机的管理标志着该国火山灾害减轻工作发展的最高点。当时应用了最先进的火山监测技术和仪器;准确预测了火山喷发;在剧烈爆炸前一个月绘制并发布了危险分区图;设计并实施了警报和预警系统;及时调动了灾害应对机制。然而,灾害的前所未有的规模和持续性质,以及它们广泛、长期的影响,对该国的火山灾害减轻系统的能力进行了严峻考验。特别是,火山泥流威胁引发了争议,并使决策者陷入在适应性方法与对抗性/控制方法之间做出选择的两难境地。至少已经阐明并不同程度和形式地采用了三种策略:(1)建立火山泥流监测 - 预警 - 疏散系统,以便在紧急情况下应对火山泥流问题;(2)将定居点从危险区域搬迁;(3)安装工程对策以控制/转移火山泥流并保护定居点。这三种策略的结合似乎是最好的,但最有效且成本最低的组合仍有待确定。