Schneiderman G, Winders P, Tallett S, Feldman W
Department of Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.
Can J Psychiatry. 1994 May;39(4):215-8. doi: 10.1177/070674379403900404.
Bereavement programs for children and parents are becoming popular since there are more and more neonatal intensive care programs, pediatric oncology programs and pediatric intensive care programs offering these services. This paper addresses the following question: Do bereavement programs work? An overview of the literature dating back to 1964 was undertaken. Only papers dealing with treatment were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials were selected as presenting the best evidence for or against program effectiveness. Methodologic features such as description of the sample, comparability of treatment and control groups, description of the intervention, use of objective, valid, reproducible and blinded outcome measures, sample size calculations, thoroughness of follow-up and attention to clinical as well as statistical significance were assessed. Four randomized controlled trials were found in the literature search. Two of the studies showed benefit, two did not. All four suffered significant methodologic flaws. At this time it is unclear as to whether or not bereavement programs help families. Given the high costs of health care, it is important that studies be done to determine which families are likely to benefit from bereavement programs and what type of program is effective.
由于越来越多的新生儿重症监护项目、儿科肿瘤项目和儿科重症监护项目提供这些服务,针对儿童和父母的哀伤辅导项目正变得越来越普遍。本文探讨以下问题:哀伤辅导项目是否有效?对可追溯至1964年的文献进行了综述。仅对涉及治疗的论文进行了审查。随机对照试验被选为提供支持或反对项目有效性的最佳证据。评估了诸如样本描述、治疗组与对照组的可比性、干预措施描述、客观、有效、可重复和盲法结局测量的使用、样本量计算、随访的彻底性以及对临床和统计学意义的关注等方法学特征。在文献检索中发现了四项随机对照试验。其中两项研究显示有益处,两项则没有。所有四项研究都存在重大方法学缺陷。目前尚不清楚哀伤辅导项目是否有助于家庭。鉴于医疗保健成本高昂,开展研究以确定哪些家庭可能从哀伤辅导项目中受益以及何种类型的项目有效非常重要。