Pepine C J, Cohn P F, Deedwania P C, Gibson R S, Handberg E, Hill J A, Miller E, Marks R G, Thadani U
University of Florida, Gainesville.
Circulation. 1994 Aug;90(2):762-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.762.
Detection of asymptomatic ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease has been associated with increased risk for adverse outcome, but treatment of patients with asymptomatic ischemia remains controversial. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine if treatment reduces adverse outcome in patients with daily life ischemia.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic outpatients with daily life silent ischemia due to coronary artery disease was conducted. The primary outcome measure was event-free survival at 1 year by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Events were death, resuscitated ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, aggravation of angina, or revascularization. The secondary outcome was ischemia during ambulatory ECG monitoring at 4 weeks. Three hundred six outpatients with mild or no angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II), abnormal exercise tests, and ischemia on ambulatory monitoring were randomized to receive either atenolol (100 mg/d) or placebo. After 4 weeks of treatment, the number (mean +/- SD, 3.6 +/- 4.2 versus 1.7 +/- 4.6 episodes, P < .001) and average duration (30 +/- 3.3 versus 16.4 +/- 6.7 minutes, P < .001) of ischemic episodes per 48 hours of ambulatory monitoring decreased in atenolol- compared with placebo-assigned patients (4.4 +/- 4.6 to 3.1 +/- 6.0 episodes and 36.6 +/- 4.1 to 30 +/- 5.5 minutes). Event-free survival improved in atenolol-treated patients (P < .0066), who had an increased time to onset of first adverse event (120 versus 79 days) and fewer total first events compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.44; 95% confidence intervals, 0.26 to 0.75; P = .001). There was a nonsignificant trend for fewer serious events (death, resuscitation from ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina) in atenolol-treated patients (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence intervals, 0.22 to 1.33; P = .175). The most powerful univariate and multivariate correlate of event-free survival was absence of ischemia on ambulatory monitoring at 4 weeks. Side effects were mild and generally similar comparing atenolol- and placebo-treated patients, although bradycardia was more frequent with atenolol.
Atenolol treatment reduced daily life ischemia and was associated with reduced risk for adverse outcome in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients compared with placebo.
在冠状动脉疾病患者中检测无症状性缺血与不良结局风险增加相关,但无症状性缺血患者的治疗仍存在争议。因此,本研究的目的是确定治疗是否能降低日常生活中存在缺血的患者的不良结局。
对因冠状动脉疾病导致日常生活中无症状或症状轻微的门诊患者进行了一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。主要结局指标是通过Kaplan-Meier分析得出的1年无事件生存率。事件包括死亡、复苏的室性心动过速/心室颤动、心肌梗死、因不稳定型心绞痛住院、心绞痛加重或血运重建。次要结局是4周动态心电图监测期间的缺血情况。306例轻度或无心绞痛(加拿大心血管学会分级I或II级)、运动试验异常且动态监测有缺血的门诊患者被随机分为接受阿替洛尔(100mg/d)或安慰剂治疗。治疗4周后,与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受阿替洛尔治疗的患者每48小时动态监测的缺血发作次数(平均±标准差,3.6±4.2次对1.7±4.6次,P<.001)和平均持续时间(30±3.3分钟对16.4±6.7分钟,P<.001)均减少(从4.4±4.6次降至3.1±6.0次,从36.6±4.1分钟降至30±5.5分钟)。阿替洛尔治疗的患者无事件生存率有所改善(P<.0066),与安慰剂组相比,首次不良事件发生时间延长(120天对79天),首次事件总数减少(相对风险,0.44;95%置信区间,0.26至0.75;P=.001)。阿替洛尔治疗的患者严重事件(死亡、从室性心动过速/心室颤动复苏、非致命性心肌梗死或因不稳定型心绞痛住院)较少,但差异无统计学意义(相对风险,0.55;95%置信区间,0.22至1.33;P=.175)。4周动态监测无缺血是无事件生存率最有力的单因素和多因素相关因素。副作用较轻,阿替洛尔治疗组和安慰剂治疗组总体相似,不过阿替洛尔组心动过缓更常见。
与安慰剂相比,阿替洛尔治疗可减少日常生活中的缺血情况,并降低无症状和症状轻微患者的不良结局风险。