Gerdes E P, Ping G
Department of Psychology, Bucknell University.
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1994 May;120(2):169-98.
We examined and compared the direct and moderating effects of problem-focused and emotion-focused coping in male and female college students in the United States and the People's Republic of China. American students reported more interference with academic activities as a result of stress; Chinese students reported more interference with personal development. American students reported a greater occurrence of stressful life events and higher stressfulness of these events. American students also reported less problem-focused coping than Chinese students. We found little evidence for an additive effect of coping; moderating effects, both buffering and maladaptive, differed by gender and culture. Particularly for American students, interference was more directly related to stress levels in men, whereas coping exhibited more moderating effects in women. Contrary to predictions, only American women exhibited a buffering effect for problem-focused coping, and no maladaptive effects of emotion-focused coping were found for any group. Chinese women, and to a lesser extent, Chinese men, exhibited a pattern of buffering effects for emotion-focused coping and maladaptive moderating effects for problem-focused coping.
我们研究并比较了美国和中华人民共和国男女大学生中以问题为中心的应对方式和以情绪为中心的应对方式的直接效应和调节效应。美国学生报告称,压力对学术活动的干扰更大;中国学生报告称,压力对个人发展的干扰更大。美国学生报告的应激性生活事件发生率更高,且这些事件的压力程度也更高。美国学生报告的以问题为中心的应对方式也比中国学生少。我们几乎没有找到应对方式具有累加效应的证据;调节效应,包括缓冲效应和适应不良效应,因性别和文化而异。特别是对于美国学生来说,干扰与男性的压力水平更直接相关,而应对方式在女性中表现出更多的调节效应。与预测相反,只有美国女性表现出以问题为中心的应对方式的缓冲效应,且未发现任何群体存在以情绪为中心的应对方式的适应不良效应。中国女性,以及程度较轻的中国男性,表现出以情绪为中心的应对方式的缓冲效应模式和以问题为中心的应对方式的适应不良调节效应模式。