Schorling J B, Klas P T, Willems J P, Everett A S
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 May;9(5):248-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02599649.
To determine whether rates of addressing alcohol use differed between family medicine and internal medicine residents, and to determine whether attitudes, confidence, and perceptions affected these relationships.
Two university outpatient clinics, one staffed by family medicine and the other by primary care and categorical internal medicine residents.
Cross-sectional study of consecutive patients who had been followed by second- and third-year residents for at least one year.
Alcohol abuse was determined using the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST), with a score > or = 5 considered positive. Rates of addressing alcohol use in the preceding year were determined by patient report and chart review. Attitudes were assessed using the Substance Abuse Attitude Survey (SAAS).
334 patients of 49 residents completed the MAST. Rates of alcoholism among the patient groups were: family medicine, 8.3%; primary care, 29.1%; and categorical medicine, 18.0% (p < 0.001). Screening behavior varied by type of residency: 47% of the family medicine, 71% of the primary care, and 65% of the categorical residents' patients reported being asked about alcohol use in the preceding year (p < 0.001); chart documentation was present for 15% of the family medicine, 38% of the primary care, and 24% of the categorical residents' patients (p < 0.001). Perceived prevalence of alcohol abuse, confidence in intervening, and several scales on the SAAS were related to residency type and to addressing alcohol use, but controlling for these variables did not affect the association between residency type and either patient report or chart documentation of screening.
Rates of addressing alcohol use differed for internal medicine and family medicine residents, but were not due to differences in resident perceptions and attitudes.
确定家庭医学住院医师和内科住院医师在处理酒精使用问题的比例上是否存在差异,并确定态度、信心和认知是否会影响这些关系。
两家大学门诊诊所,一家由家庭医学医生坐诊,另一家由初级保健和分类内科住院医师坐诊。
对由二年级和三年级住院医师随访至少一年的连续患者进行横断面研究。
使用密歇根酒精中毒筛查测试(MAST)来确定酒精滥用情况,得分≥5分被视为阳性。通过患者报告和病历审查来确定上一年处理酒精使用问题的比例。使用药物滥用态度调查(SAAS)来评估态度。
49名住院医师的334名患者完成了MAST测试。患者组中的酒精中毒比例分别为:家庭医学组8.3%;初级保健组29.1%;分类内科组18.0%(p<0.001)。筛查行为因住院医师类型而异:47%的家庭医学住院医师、71%的初级保健住院医师以及65%的分类内科住院医师的患者报告称上一年被询问过酒精使用情况(p<0.001);病历记录显示,家庭医学住院医师的患者中有15%、初级保健住院医师的患者中有38%、分类内科住院医师的患者中有24%(p<0.001)。对酒精滥用的感知患病率、干预信心以及SAAS上的几个量表与住院医师类型和处理酒精使用问题有关,但控制这些变量并未影响住院医师类型与患者报告或筛查病历记录之间的关联。
内科和家庭医学住院医师在处理酒精使用问题的比例上存在差异,但并非由于住院医师的认知和态度不同。