Suppr超能文献

针对患者的提醒信以及儿童健康保健检查率。

Patient-specific reminder letters and pediatric well-child-care show rates.

作者信息

Campbell J R, Szilagyi P G, Rodewald L E, Doane C, Roghmann K J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY.

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1994 May;33(5):268-72. doi: 10.1177/000992289403300503.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether patient-specific letters, which describe the content of an upcoming well-child appointment, improve the show rate of well-child appointments better than postcard reminders. In this prospective clinical trial conducted at a pediatric continuity clinic in a teaching hospital, 288 newborns were randomized to a letter, postcard, or control group. For every well-child appointment, families were sent either a letter pertaining to the particular well-child appointment or a postcard; the control group received no reminders. There were no differences in demographics among the groups. The show rates between the letter and postcard groups were not different, but were significantly higher than the show rate for the control group (75.0%, 73.7%, and 67.5%, respectively; P < .05). A cost comparison between the use of postcards versus not using postcards revealed a benefit in the former. We concluded postcard reminders are effective in improving show rates for well-child-care visits, and that patient-specific letters have no additional benefit above that of postcard reminders.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定针对特定患者的信件(描述即将到来的健康儿童预约的内容)是否比明信片提醒能更好地提高健康儿童预约的就诊率。在一家教学医院的儿科连续性诊所进行的这项前瞻性临床试验中,288名新生儿被随机分为信件组、明信片组或对照组。对于每次健康儿童预约,向家庭发送与特定健康儿童预约相关的信件或明信片;对照组不接收提醒。各组之间的人口统计学特征没有差异。信件组和明信片组的就诊率没有差异,但均显著高于对照组的就诊率(分别为75.0%、73.7%和67.5%;P < .05)。使用明信片与不使用明信片的成本比较显示前者有优势。我们得出结论,明信片提醒能有效提高健康儿童保健就诊率,且针对特定患者的信件相比明信片提醒没有额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验