• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Does the Delaney Clause of the U.S. Food and Drug laws prevent human cancers?

作者信息

Weisburger J H

机构信息

American Health Foundation, Valhalla, New York 10595.

出版信息

Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994 May;22(4):483-93. doi: 10.1006/faat.1994.1055.

DOI:10.1006/faat.1994.1055
PMID:8056196
Abstract

The Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, enacted in 1958, prohibits the addition to the human food supply of any chemical that had caused cancer in humans or animals. The aim was to prevent cancer in humans. The scientific knowledge on causes of cancer and mechanisms of carcinogenesis in the 1950s can be rationalized to justify enactment of this Clause at that time. Since then, important progress in the fields of mechanism of carcinogenesis and cancer causation, and in analytical chemistry permitting accurate determination of trace amounts of chemicals, suggests that the Clause requires modification based on current knowledge. The documented human carcinogens are DNA reactive or genotoxic. Thus, the Clause should emphasize prohibition of the addition to human foods of proven genotoxins that are likely human cancer risks by contemporary standards. Such genotoxic carcinogens are those reliably positive in a battery of three tests, the Ames test in Salmonella typhimurium, the Williams test with evidence of DNA repair in hepatocytes, and direct documentation of DNA adduct formation in the 32P-postlabeling technique of Randerath.

摘要

相似文献

1
Does the Delaney Clause of the U.S. Food and Drug laws prevent human cancers?
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994 May;22(4):483-93. doi: 10.1006/faat.1994.1055.
2
A regulatory relic: After 60 years of research on cancer risk, the Delaney Clause continues to keep us in the past.一个监管的遗物:在对癌症风险进行了 60 年的研究之后,德莱尼条款继续让我们停留在过去。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 15;433:115779. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115779. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
3
Risk assessment of carcinogens in food with special consideration of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Scientific arguments for use of risk assessment and for changing the Delaney Clause specifically.食品中致癌物的风险评估,特别考虑非遗传毒性致癌物。使用风险评估以及具体更改《德莱尼条款》的科学依据。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):209-15. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80046-7.
4
Human protection against non-genotoxic carcinogens in the US without the Delaney Clause.
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):201-8. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80045-5.
5
The 37 year history of the Delaney Clause.德莱尼条款的37年历史。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):183-8. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80040-6.
6
Change the rules for food additives.
Nature. 1994 Apr 14;368(6472):582. doi: 10.1038/368582a0.
7
How the 62-year old Delaney Clause continues to thwart science: Case study of the flavor substance β-myrcene.62 岁的德莱尼条款如何继续阻碍科学发展:β-月桂烯风味物质案例研究。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;115:104708. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104708. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
8
Current carcinogen perspectives: De minimis, Delaney and decisions.当前的致癌物观点:微量豁免、德莱尼条款与决策
Sci Total Environ. 1989 Oct 1;86(1-2):5-13. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(89)90188-5.
9
Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA.《德莱尼条款》在美国环境保护局的影响。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):199-200. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80044-3.
10
Food safety and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Delaney Clause). AMA Council on Scientific Affairs.食品安全与《食品、药品和化妆品法案》(德莱尼条款)。美国医学协会科学事务委员会。
Conn Med. 1980 Mar;44(3):167-9.