• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德莱尼条款的37年历史。

The 37 year history of the Delaney Clause.

作者信息

Weisburger J H

机构信息

American Health Foundation, Valhalla, NY.

出版信息

Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):183-8. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80040-6.

DOI:10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80040-6
PMID:8672873
Abstract

The Delaney Clause has been part of the US Food, Drug and Cosmetic laws since it was enacted by the Congress in 1958. It states that no cancer-causing agent, as demonstrated in humans or animals, shall be deliberately added to, or found as a contaminant in food. The FDA was charged with enforcing this Clause. Other agencies such as EPA used similar approaches with the avowed aim to prevent cancer. Legal cases have been brought against Agencies who failed to comply with this law to the letter. Since 1958, research has elucidated the main mechanisms whereby chemicals cause cancer. The leading causative factors of the major human cancers are basically known, and include smoking and tobacco use, excessive alcohol, and common dietary practices and nutritional traditions. The etiology of lymphomas, leukemias and cervical cancer may be viruses. The Delaney Clause was designed to protect against these many cancer types. It was based on the hypothesis held in the 1950s that human cancers are due to environmental chemicals. This is clearly not true for the great majority of cancers and therefore, the Delaney Clause as framed has not saved any lives, is obsolete, and should be eliminated.

摘要

自1958年国会颁布以来,《德莱尼条款》一直是美国食品、药品和化妆品法律的一部分。该条款规定,任何经人体或动物实验证明有致癌性的物质,不得故意添加到食品中,也不得在食品中作为污染物出现。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)负责执行该条款。其他机构,如美国环境保护局(EPA),也采用类似方法,公开宣称旨在预防癌症。有人对未能严格遵守该法律的机构提起法律诉讼。自1958年以来,研究阐明了化学物质致癌的主要机制。主要人类癌症的主要致病因素基本已知,包括吸烟和使用烟草、过量饮酒以及常见的饮食习惯和营养传统。淋巴瘤、白血病和宫颈癌的病因可能是病毒。《德莱尼条款》旨在预防这些多种癌症类型。它基于二十世纪五十年代的一种假设,即人类癌症是由环境化学物质引起的。显然,对于绝大多数癌症来说并非如此,因此,既定的《德莱尼条款》并未挽救任何生命,已过时,应该废除。

相似文献

1
The 37 year history of the Delaney Clause.德莱尼条款的37年历史。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):183-8. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80040-6.
2
Human protection against non-genotoxic carcinogens in the US without the Delaney Clause.
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):201-8. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80045-5.
3
Risk assessment of carcinogens in food with special consideration of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Scientific arguments for use of risk assessment and for changing the Delaney Clause specifically.食品中致癌物的风险评估,特别考虑非遗传毒性致癌物。使用风险评估以及具体更改《德莱尼条款》的科学依据。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):209-15. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80046-7.
4
A regulatory relic: After 60 years of research on cancer risk, the Delaney Clause continues to keep us in the past.一个监管的遗物:在对癌症风险进行了 60 年的研究之后,德莱尼条款继续让我们停留在过去。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 15;433:115779. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115779. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA.《德莱尼条款》在美国环境保护局的影响。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):199-200. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80044-3.
6
Living with and reforming the Delaney Clause.
Food Drug Law J. 1995;50(2):235-56.
7
Impact of the Delaney Clause at the FDA.德莱尼条款在美国食品药品监督管理局的影响。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):198. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80043-1.
8
Does the Delaney Clause of the U.S. Food and Drug laws prevent human cancers?
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994 May;22(4):483-93. doi: 10.1006/faat.1994.1055.
9
Food safety regulation: reforming the Delaney Clause.食品安全监管:改革德莱尼条款。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:313-40. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.313.
10
A de minimis exception to the Delaney Clause: a reassessment of Les v. Reilly.德莱尼条款的微量豁免:对莱斯诉赖利案的重新评估。
Food Drug Law J. 1995;50(2):257-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Cosmetics as endocrine disruptors: are they a health risk?作为内分泌干扰物的化妆品:它们会对健康构成风险吗?
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2015 Dec;16(4):373-83. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9329-4.