• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品中致癌物的风险评估,特别考虑非遗传毒性致癌物。使用风险评估以及具体更改《德莱尼条款》的科学依据。

Risk assessment of carcinogens in food with special consideration of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Scientific arguments for use of risk assessment and for changing the Delaney Clause specifically.

作者信息

Williams G M, Karbe E, Fenner-Crisp P, Iatropoulos M J, Weisburger J H

机构信息

Division of Pathology and Toxicology, American Health Foundation, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.

出版信息

Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):209-15. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80046-7.

DOI:10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80046-7
PMID:8672879
Abstract

The document "Risk Assessment of Carcinogens in Food with Special Consideration of Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens" was produced by the International Federation of Societies of Toxicologic Pathologists on the occasion of its triannual meeting in Tours, France, April 23-26, 1995. Subsequently, it was endorsed by the North American Society of Toxicologic Pathologists at its annual meeting in San Diego, CA, USA, June 11-15, 1995. This document was written to address up-to-date risk assessment of carcinogens and anachronisms in the Delaney Clause of the US Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act which have become evident since its enactment in 1958. In the intervening years, major progress has been made in understanding mechanisms of cancer induction and in recognizing causes of human cancer. The Clause in conjunction with its present legal interpretation and implementation does not provide for rational, scientific evaluation of carcinogens. It ignores the fact that the diverse mechanisms now known to underlie cancer increases in rodents exposed to high doses of chemicals are often inapplicable to man. In this regard, current evaluation of chemicals based on the tenets of the Delaney Clause is irrational in many cases. The document presents several examples of chemicals to which humans may be exposed through food and which illustrate the need for science-based risk assessment. Appropriate risk assessment methods are available to provide assurance of negligible risk, and accordingly, it is recommended that the Delaney Clause be rescinded as it has outlived its usefulness. This will enable US governmental agencies to regulate the use of chemicals in foods by using appropriate current scientific methods on a case by case basis within the context of other relevant legislation.

摘要

《食品中致癌物的风险评估——特别考虑非遗传毒性致癌物》这份文件是由国际毒理病理学家协会在其于1995年4月23日至26日在法国图尔召开的每三年一次的会议期间编制的。随后,它在美国加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥举行的北美毒理病理学家协会1995年6月11日至15日年度会议上得到认可。编写这份文件是为了应对致癌物的最新风险评估以及自1958年美国联邦食品、药品和化妆品法案的德莱尼条款颁布以来已变得明显的不合时宜之处。在这期间,在理解癌症诱发机制和认识人类癌症病因方面取得了重大进展。该条款及其目前的法律解释和实施并未对致癌物进行合理、科学的评估。它忽视了这样一个事实,即现在已知在高剂量接触化学物质的啮齿动物中导致癌症增加的各种机制往往不适用于人类。在这方面,目前基于德莱尼条款原则对化学物质的评估在许多情况下是不合理的。该文件列举了一些人类可能通过食物接触的化学物质的例子,这些例子说明了进行基于科学的风险评估的必要性。有适当的风险评估方法可用于确保风险可忽略不计,因此,建议废除德莱尼条款,因为它已不再有用。这将使美国政府机构能够在其他相关立法的背景下,逐案使用适当的现行科学方法来监管食品中化学物质的使用。

相似文献

1
Risk assessment of carcinogens in food with special consideration of non-genotoxic carcinogens. Scientific arguments for use of risk assessment and for changing the Delaney Clause specifically.食品中致癌物的风险评估,特别考虑非遗传毒性致癌物。使用风险评估以及具体更改《德莱尼条款》的科学依据。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):209-15. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80046-7.
2
Human protection against non-genotoxic carcinogens in the US without the Delaney Clause.
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):201-8. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80045-5.
3
Impact of the Delaney Clause in the EPA.《德莱尼条款》在美国环境保护局的影响。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):199-200. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80044-3.
4
Impact of the Delaney Clause at the FDA.德莱尼条款在美国食品药品监督管理局的影响。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):198. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80043-1.
5
A regulatory relic: After 60 years of research on cancer risk, the Delaney Clause continues to keep us in the past.一个监管的遗物:在对癌症风险进行了 60 年的研究之后,德莱尼条款继续让我们停留在过去。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 15;433:115779. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115779. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
The 37 year history of the Delaney Clause.德莱尼条款的37年历史。
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Feb;48(2-3):183-8. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(96)80040-6.
7
Living with and reforming the Delaney Clause.
Food Drug Law J. 1995;50(2):235-56.
8
Risk assessment of carcinogens in food.食品中致癌物的风险评估。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 Mar 1;243(2):180-90. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
9
Change the rules for food additives.
Nature. 1994 Apr 14;368(6472):582. doi: 10.1038/368582a0.
10
Does the Delaney Clause of the U.S. Food and Drug laws prevent human cancers?
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994 May;22(4):483-93. doi: 10.1006/faat.1994.1055.

引用本文的文献

1
Food-Borne Chemical Carcinogens and the Evidence for Human Cancer Risk.食源性化学致癌物与人类癌症风险证据
Foods. 2022 Sep 13;11(18):2828. doi: 10.3390/foods11182828.