Brooks D, Kuwata K, Schleich T
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Sinsheimer Laboratories, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064.
Magn Reson Med. 1994 Mar;31(3):331-6. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910310315.
Two procedures are currently in use for the determination of proton magnetization transfer rate constants between macromolecular tissue components and water. The first method assumes that there are only two spin baths (macromolecular plus solvent) and that during off-resonance irradiation complete saturation of the "immobile" proton spin bath occurs (S. H. Koenig, R. D. Brown, III, R. Ugolini, Magn. Reson. Med. 29, 311 (1993)). This approach neglects the possibility of incomplete saturation and polydispersity, and yields an apparent magnetization transfer rate constant, Kapp. The second approach utilizes a formalism which can account for polydispersity and incomplete saturation of the immobile spin bath (K. Kuwata, D. Brooks, H. Yang, T. Schleich, J. Magn. Reson., in press). In this work magnetization transfer rate constants derived by the use of both methods for two systems, ocular lens tissue and cross-linked bovine serum albumin (BSA) were compared. For both samples Kapp was dependent on B2 off-resonance irradiation frequency and power when the first method was used. The second method provided values of the magnetization transfer rate constant that were similar to the values obtained by the first method, as the limit of complete saturation was approached.
目前有两种方法用于测定大分子组织成分与水之间的质子磁化转移速率常数。第一种方法假定只存在两个自旋池(大分子加溶剂),并且在失谐照射期间,“固定”质子自旋池会完全饱和(S.H. 凯尼格、R.D. 布朗三世、R. 乌戈利尼,《磁共振医学》29卷,311页(1993年))。这种方法忽略了不完全饱和和多分散性的可能性,得出的是表观磁化转移速率常数Kapp。第二种方法采用一种形式体系,该体系可以解释固定自旋池的多分散性和不完全饱和(K. 桑田、D. 布鲁克斯、H. 杨、T. 施莱希,《磁共振杂志》,即将发表)。在这项研究中,比较了使用这两种方法得出的两种体系(晶状体组织和交联牛血清白蛋白(BSA))的磁化转移速率常数。当使用第一种方法时,对于这两个样品,Kapp均取决于B2失谐照射频率和功率。随着接近完全饱和的极限,第二种方法得出的磁化转移速率常数值与第一种方法得到的值相似。