Kumar D, Kumar S, Lyon D
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Mod Pathol. 1994 Apr;7(3):354-60.
In an attempt to compare results of fresh and fixed tissue flow cytometric DNA analysis we analyzed paraffin blocks of 87 solid tumors; 67 of these were DNA aneuploid and 20 were DNA euploid by fresh flow cytometric analysis. Forty-two aneuploid tumors and all diploid tumors were concordant (71.3% concordance), whereas 25 of 67 (37%) aneuploid tumors appeared diploid on fixed tissue analysis. Reasons for discordance included loss of small aneuploid peaks, merging of G1/G0 peaks of diploid and aneuploid stemlines giving a broad G1/G0 peak, and masking of near-tetraploid aneuploid peaks by the G2/M peak in fixed tissue. S-phase fraction could be determined in 51 of 67 (76%) aneuploid cases analyzed fresh and 29 of 42 (69%) concordant aneuploid cases analyzed from fixed tissues. All parameters were consistently higher in the fixed tissue: S-phase fraction (mean = 18.29% versus 12.82%), coefficient of variation of diploid G1/G0 peak (5.62% versus 2.11%), and DNA index (1.79 versus 1.69). We conclude that significant differences exist between flow cytometric data obtained from analysis of fresh versus fixed tissues and therefore prognostic correlations made on the basis of results of fixed tissue flow cytometric analysis may not necessarily parallel those of fresh tissue studies.
为了比较新鲜组织和固定组织流式细胞术DNA分析的结果,我们分析了87例实体瘤的石蜡块;通过新鲜组织流式细胞术分析,其中67例为DNA非整倍体,20例为DNA整倍体。42例非整倍体肿瘤和所有二倍体肿瘤结果一致(一致性为71.3%),而在固定组织分析中,67例非整倍体肿瘤中有25例(37%)显示为二倍体。结果不一致的原因包括小非整倍体峰的丢失、二倍体和非整倍体干细胞系的G1/G0峰合并形成一个宽的G1/G0峰,以及固定组织中G2/M峰掩盖了近四倍体非整倍体峰。在67例新鲜分析的非整倍体病例中有51例(76%)以及42例一致的固定组织分析非整倍体病例中有29例(69%)可以确定S期分数。固定组织中的所有参数均持续较高:S期分数(平均值=18.29%对12.82%)、二倍体G1/G0峰的变异系数(5.62%对2.11%)和DNA指数(1.79对1.69)。我们得出结论,新鲜组织与固定组织分析获得的流式细胞术数据之间存在显著差异,因此基于固定组织流式细胞术分析结果得出的预后相关性不一定与新鲜组织研究的结果平行。