• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[新型喹诺酮类药物环丙沙星和培氟沙星在实验性鼠疫中的疗效]

[Effectiveness of the new quinolones, ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin in experimental plague].

作者信息

Kasatkina I V, Sherbaniuk A I, Makarovskaia L N, Padeĭskaia E N

出版信息

Antibiot Khimioter. 1993 Jan;38(1):42-5.

PMID:8060184
Abstract

Efficacy of ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin in plague infection was studies on albino mice by comparison with that of nalidixic acid. The mice were contaminated subcutaneously. The treatment with the drugs was started 6 or 24 hours after the contamination. The MICs of ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin and nalidixic acid were 0.01 to 0.02, 0.15 and 1.25 to 2.5 micrograms/ml respectively. By the ED50 ciprofloxacin proved to be the most efficient. Pefloxacin was 6 times less efficient and nalidixic acid was 100 times less efficient. The quinolones were shown to be highly efficient when administered at 48-hour intervals.

摘要

通过与萘啶酸比较,研究了环丙沙星和培氟沙星对白化病小鼠鼠疫感染的疗效。小鼠经皮下感染。在感染后6或24小时开始用药物治疗。环丙沙星、培氟沙星和萘啶酸的最低抑菌浓度分别为0.01至0.02、0.15和1.25至2.5微克/毫升。通过半数有效剂量证明环丙沙星效率最高。培氟沙星的效率低6倍,萘啶酸的效率低100倍。喹诺酮类药物以48小时间隔给药时显示出高效。

相似文献

1
[Effectiveness of the new quinolones, ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin in experimental plague].[新型喹诺酮类药物环丙沙星和培氟沙星在实验性鼠疫中的疗效]
Antibiot Khimioter. 1993 Jan;38(1):42-5.
2
[Effectiveness of new quinolones in experimental aerogenic plague infection of albino mice].[新型喹诺酮类药物对白化病小鼠实验性空气传播鼠疫感染的疗效]
Antibiot Khimioter. 1994 Jun;39(6):13-4.
3
[Combined use of quinolones with other antibiotics in treatment of experimental plague infection].[喹诺酮类药物与其他抗生素联合用于治疗实验性鼠疫感染]
Antibiot Khimioter. 1994 May;39(5):38-40.
4
[Comparative in vitro study of the activity of 5 quinolones against Acinetobacter calcoaceticus].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 May;33(5):416-20.
5
Comparative activities of pefloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronic respiratory tract infections.培氟沙星与环丙沙星治疗慢性呼吸道感染的对比活性
J Chemother. 1995 Apr;7(2):140-5. doi: 10.1179/joc.1995.7.2.140.
6
In vitro activity of pefloxacin compared with five other quinolones on nalidixic acid-resistant proteae species.培氟沙星与其他五种喹诺酮类药物对耐萘啶酸变形杆菌属细菌的体外活性比较。
Chemioterapia. 1988 Oct;7(5):287-91.
7
Quinolone therapy of Klebsiella pneumoniae sepsis following irradiation: comparison of pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin.辐射后肺炎克雷伯菌败血症的喹诺酮治疗:培氟沙星、环丙沙星和氧氟沙星的比较。
Radiat Res. 1990 May;122(2):215-7.
8
[Chromosomal resistance of plague agent to quinolones].[鼠疫杆菌对喹诺酮类药物的染色体耐药性]
Antibiot Khimioter. 1991 Aug;36(8):35-7.
9
[Lack of levofloxacin and moxyfloxacin efficacy in experimental plague of albino mice infected with nalidixic acid resistant pathogen (Nal(r))].
Antibiot Khimioter. 2010;55(11-12):22-4.
10
[Comparative in vitro antistaphylococcal effect of norfloxacin and pefloxacin on 312 hospital strains].诺氟沙星与培氟沙星对312株医院菌株的体外抗葡萄球菌效果比较
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 May;33(5):381-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic Therapy of Plague: A Review.《鼠疫的抗生素治疗:综述》
Biomolecules. 2021 May 12;11(5):724. doi: 10.3390/biom11050724.
2
Antibiotic treatment of experimental pneumonic plague in mice.小鼠实验性肺鼠疫的抗生素治疗
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Mar;42(3):675-81. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.3.675.