Tominaga K, Matsuo T, Kuga Y, Mizuno A
First Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry, Japan.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Sep;52(9):945-50; discussion 950-1. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80076-x.
The utility of subperiosteal tissue expansion (STE) for mandibular augmentation with hydroxylapatite (HA) particles was evaluated experimentally in two groups of dogs.
Eight grams of solid HA particles were implanted in previously formed bilateral subperiosteal expanded beds on the mandible. In one group, the HA particles were implanted in the intact subperiosteal expanded bed and in the other the newly formed capsule overlying the bone was removed before implantation of HA.
Despite marked augmentation with a large number of HA particles, there was neither deformity nor infection of the implants, which maintained the original desired contour. The firm fibrous capsule formed by STE allowed consolidation of the HA particles and prevented their migration. In the first group, although histologic evidence of bony union of the implanted particles was not seen even after 2 months, clinical immobilization of the grafts was achieved in 1 to 2 months. After 1 year, substantial bone growth into the implants was observed. In the second group, clinical immobilization was observed even after 2 weeks. Histologic evidence of bony union of the particles located along the surface of the mandible was observed after 1 or 2 months. In these specimens, however, marked bone resorption of the mandibular cortex, was also noted. No evidence of bone or osteoid formation on the expanded periosteal side was noted in either group.
These results provide fundamental data regarding mandibular augmentation using STE, and indicate that the subperiosteal expanded bed is an excellent recipient site for onlayed implants.
在两组犬中通过实验评估骨膜下组织扩张术(STE)联合羟基磷灰石(HA)颗粒用于下颌骨增大术的效用。
将8克固体HA颗粒植入预先形成的双侧下颌骨骨膜下扩张床中。一组将HA颗粒植入完整的骨膜下扩张床,另一组在植入HA之前去除覆盖骨的新形成的包膜。
尽管大量HA颗粒实现了显著增大,但植入物既无畸形也无感染,维持了最初期望的外形。STE形成的坚固纤维包膜使HA颗粒得以巩固并防止其迁移。在第一组中,尽管即使2个月后也未见植入颗粒骨结合的组织学证据,但移植物在1至2个月内实现了临床固定。1年后,观察到大量骨长入植入物。在第二组中,甚至2周后就观察到了临床固定。1或2个月后观察到沿下颌骨表面的颗粒骨结合的组织学证据。然而,在这些标本中,也注意到下颌骨皮质有明显的骨吸收。两组在扩张的骨膜侧均未发现骨或类骨质形成的证据。
这些结果提供了关于使用STE进行下颌骨增大术的基础数据,并表明骨膜下扩张床是覆盖植入物的理想受体部位。