Lin Z, Lafolie P, Beck O
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Anal Toxicol. 1994 May-Jun;18(3):129-33. doi: 10.1093/jat/18.3.129.
Different analytical procedures for quantitation of total morphine and codeine in urine were evaluated. Hydrolysis of urine with hydrochloric acid and four different enzymes was compared. In order to effect complete hydrolysis of glucuronide conjugates, hydrolysis with 6.5M HCl containing bisulphite and heating at 100 degrees C for 20 min was required. Results using this hydrolysis procedure agreed well with results from direct analysis of free and conjugated forms by liquid chromatography. Use of more dilute HCl but at a higher temperature was not sufficient. Some enzymatic procedures appeared to give effective hydrolysis with a higher variability, but these procedures were more time-consuming. There was a good quantitative agreement between FID gas chromatography and ion-trap gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The validated analytical procedure was applied to authentic patient samples.
对尿液中总吗啡和可待因定量的不同分析程序进行了评估。比较了用盐酸和四种不同酶对尿液进行水解的情况。为了使葡糖醛酸缀合物完全水解,需要用含亚硫酸氢盐的6.5M盐酸水解并在100℃加热20分钟。使用该水解程序得到的结果与通过液相色谱直接分析游离和缀合形式的结果非常吻合。使用更稀的盐酸但在更高温度下进行水解是不够的。一些酶促程序似乎能有效水解,但变异性更高,而且这些程序更耗时。火焰离子化检测器气相色谱法和离子阱气相色谱/质谱法之间在定量方面具有良好的一致性。经验证的分析程序应用于真实患者样本。