Suppr超能文献

“年龄歧视”与安乐死诉讼。

'Ageism' and right to die litigation.

作者信息

Kapp M B

机构信息

Office of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.

出版信息

Med Law. 1994;13(1-2):69-77.

PMID:8065251
Abstract

This study examines 88 reported judicial decisions involving adult patients and decisions about life-prolonging medical treatments. The patient's age by itself does not appear to be a factor influencing findings of mental competency or incompetency or findings of the appropriateness or inappropriateness of abating life-prolonging medical treatments. Neither can an explicit ageist bias be extracted from an analysis of the text of judicial decisions in this arena. Various potential explanations for the lack of apparent ageist bias are suggested.

摘要

本研究考察了88项已报道的涉及成年患者以及关于延长生命的医疗治疗决策的司法判决。患者的年龄本身似乎并不是影响精神能力合格与否的判定结果,或者影响中止延长生命的医疗治疗是否恰当的判定结果的一个因素。从对这一领域司法判决文本的分析中,也无法提炼出明显的年龄歧视偏见。文中提出了对于缺乏明显年龄歧视偏见的各种潜在解释。

相似文献

4
The right to refuse treatment is not a right to be killed.拒绝治疗的权利并非是被杀死的权利。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):154-8; discussion 161-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.154.
5
Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Univ Detroit Law Rev. 1987 Spring;64(3):557-77.
8
Love and let die.
Time. 1990 Mar 19;135(12):62-8, 70-1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验