• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物行为疼痛概况:发展与心理测量特性

Biobehavioral pain profile: development and psychometric properties.

作者信息

Dalton Jo Ann, Feuerstein Michael, Carlson John, Roghman Klaus

机构信息

University of North Carolina School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA Center for Occupational Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14618 USA University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642 USA.

出版信息

Pain. 1994 Apr;57(1):95-107. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90113-9.

DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90113-9
PMID:8065803
Abstract

Although a number of self-report indices that measure intensity and psychosocial components of the pain experience are available, these measures do not assess the range of cognitive, behavioral, and physiological reactions frequently associated with pain. This paper describes the initial determination of the psychometric properties of the Biobehavioral Pain Profile (BPP) developed to measure these reactions. The BPP is a 41-item self-report scale tested in a sample of 617 subjects with chronic recurrent pain, chronic non-malignant pain or chronic malignant pain. Kaiser's measure of sampling adequacy was 0.918. Factor analysis revealed 6 theoretically meaningful factors: Environmental Influences, Loss of Control, Health Care Avoidance, Past and Current Experience, Physiological Responsivity, and Thoughts of Disease Progression. Cronbach's alpha scores for the specific subscales ranged from r = 0.77 to r = 0.94. Test-retest reliability for the scales ranged from 0.57 to 0.73. Low correlations among the BPP and general indices of fear, depression, anxiety, body consciousness and social desirability are reported. The BPP appears to provide a unique composite assessment of self-report of behavioral, physiological, and cognitive reactions to pain experienced by individuals with a wide range of pain problems.

摘要

尽管有许多用于测量疼痛体验的强度和心理社会成分的自我报告指标,但这些指标并未评估经常与疼痛相关的认知、行为和生理反应范围。本文描述了为测量这些反应而开发的生物行为疼痛概况(BPP)心理测量特性的初步测定。BPP是一个包含41个条目的自我报告量表,在617名患有慢性复发性疼痛、慢性非恶性疼痛或慢性恶性疼痛的受试者样本中进行了测试。Kaiser抽样适当性度量值为0.918。因子分析揭示了6个具有理论意义的因子:环境影响、失控感、医疗回避、过去和当前经历、生理反应性以及疾病进展想法。特定子量表的Cronbach's alpha分数范围为r = 0.77至r = 0.94。量表的重测信度范围为0.57至0.73。报告显示BPP与恐惧、抑郁、焦虑、身体意识和社会期望的一般指标之间的相关性较低。BPP似乎为广泛疼痛问题患者对疼痛的行为、生理和认知反应的自我报告提供了独特的综合评估。

相似文献

1
Biobehavioral pain profile: development and psychometric properties.生物行为疼痛概况:发展与心理测量特性
Pain. 1994 Apr;57(1):95-107. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90113-9.
2
Biobehavioral pain profile in individuals with chronic spine pain.慢性脊柱疼痛患者的生物行为疼痛特征
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Aug 18.
3
The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders.疼痛残疾问卷:一种用于慢性肌肉骨骼疾病的新的心理测量学上可靠的测量工具。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2290-302; discussion 2303. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142221.88111.0f.
4
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.
5
The Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ): development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess the impact of chronic pain on adolescents.巴斯青少年疼痛问卷(BAPQ):一种评估慢性疼痛对青少年影响的工具的开发及初步心理测量学评估
Pain. 2005 Nov;118(1-2):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.025. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
6
The Fear of Pain Questionnaire: Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Italian translation.疼痛恐惧问卷:意大利语翻译版的因子结构、效度和信度。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210757. eCollection 2019.
7
Development and validation of the Treatment Expectations in Chronic Pain Scale.治疗期望在慢性疼痛量表中的开发和验证。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):610-628. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12371. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
Development and psychometric evaluation of the pain impact inventory.疼痛影响量表的编制及心理测量学评价。
Pain Pract. 2009 Nov-Dec;9(6):418-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00314.x. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
9
The Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile-Roland Scale for chronic pain: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.意大利版 Sickness Impact Profile-Roland 量表用于慢性疼痛:跨文化适应性、信度、效度和变化敏感性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1299-305. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.527030. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Centrality of Pain Scale.疼痛中心度量表的心理测量特性。
J Pain. 2015 Jul;16(7):676-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal patient education for cancer pain: a systematic review and theory-based meta-analysis.癌症疼痛的最佳患者教育:系统评价和基于理论的荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3529-37. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1995-0. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
2
Pain Intensity and Pain Interference in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study of Biopsychosocial Predictors.肺癌患者的疼痛强度与疼痛干扰:生物心理社会预测因素的初步研究
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct;38(5):457-64. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3182a79009.
3
A review and critique of assessment instruments for patients with persistent pain.
对持续性疼痛患者评估工具的回顾与评价。
J Pain Res. 2009 Mar 11;2:21-47. doi: 10.2147/jpr.s4949.
4
Effects of brief pain education on hospitalized cancer patients with moderate to severe pain.简短疼痛教育对中度至重度疼痛住院癌症患者的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Sep;12(9):645-52. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0626-1.