Himbert D, Steg P G, Juliard J M, Neukirch F, Aumont M C, Gourgon R
Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Eur Heart J. 1994 Apr;15(4):483-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060531.
Reperfusion therapy by thrombolysis or angioplasty was considered in 260 unselected patients consecutively admitted within 6 h of the onset of Q wave myocardial infarction. Rates of reperfusion and in-hospital mortality were compared in 206 patients < 70 years and 54 patients > or = 70 years. Early reperfusion was obtained in 86.4% of the patients under 70 years and in 72.2% of those over 70 (P < 0.01). Thrombolysis was more frequently used in the younger group (66.0% vs 31.5%, P < 10(-5)), and primary angioplasty in the older (44.4% vs 29.6%, P < 0.05). Overall in-hospital mortality was higher in the older group (22.2% vs 4.4%, P < 10(-5)). After successful reperfusion, mortality was 12.8% in the patients over 70 and 3.9% in those under 70. After failed or unproven reperfusion, mortality was 46.7% in the patients over 70 and 7.1% in those under 70. Reperfusion therapy is feasible in the majority of patients over 70 years, but failure to attempt or to achieve reperfusion is associated with a poor outcome. Although not controlled, this study provides an incentive for attempting early reperfusion therapy as often as possible in the elderly with acute myocardial infarction.
对260例在Q波型心肌梗死发病6小时内连续收治的未经挑选的患者考虑进行溶栓或血管成形术再灌注治疗。比较了206例年龄小于70岁和54例年龄大于或等于70岁患者的再灌注率和住院死亡率。70岁以下患者中86.4%获得了早期再灌注,70岁以上患者中这一比例为72.2%(P<0.01)。年轻组更常使用溶栓治疗(66.0%对31.5%,P<10⁻⁵),而老年组更常进行直接血管成形术(44.4%对29.6%,P<0.05)。老年组的总体住院死亡率更高(22.2%对4.4%,P<10⁻⁵)。再灌注成功后,70岁以上患者的死亡率为12.8%,70岁以下患者为3.9%。再灌注失败或未证实成功后,70岁以上患者的死亡率为46.7%,70岁以下患者为7.1%。再灌注治疗在大多数70岁以上患者中是可行的,但未能尝试或实现再灌注与不良预后相关。尽管本研究未设对照,但它为尽可能经常地对老年急性心肌梗死患者尝试早期再灌注治疗提供了动力。