Frayssé C, Pouezat J A
Department of Pedodontics, Laboratory of Research on Calcified Tissues and Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Surgery, Nantes, France.
World Health Stat Q. 1994;47(2):62-4.
The aim of the study described in this article is to propose a suitable index for epidemiological surveys. The authors define the characteristics of a good index to evaluate a presumed pathology, dental fluorosis, whoever the examiner and whatever the circumstances. The earliest and most commonly used index is Dean's because it permits data comparison among studies. But it has shortcomings due to the low accuracy of its definitions. The TSIF proposed by Horowitz et al. does not bring any noteworthy improvement to the Dean index. The new TF index devised by Thylstrup & Fejerskov is a logical improvement of the Dean index and can reliably be compared with Dean's. The sensitivity of this index come from its 9 stages reflecting the histopathology and fluoride content in the enamel. At the moment it is the most outstanding index for evaluating the severity of fluorosis.
本文所述研究的目的是提出一个适用于流行病学调查的指标。作者定义了一个用于评估假定病症——氟斑牙的良好指标的特征,无论检查者是谁以及在何种情况下。最早且最常用的指标是迪恩指数,因为它允许在不同研究之间进行数据比较。但由于其定义的准确性较低,它存在缺点。霍洛维茨等人提出的TSIF指数并未给迪恩指数带来任何显著改进。蒂尔斯楚普和费耶斯科夫设计的新TF指数是迪恩指数的合理改进,并且可以可靠地与迪恩指数进行比较。该指数的敏感性源于其9个阶段,这些阶段反映了牙釉质中的组织病理学和氟含量。目前,它是评估氟中毒严重程度的最出色指标。