• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节筛查原则与先天性髋关节脱位

Principles of screening and congenital dislocation of the hip.

作者信息

Jones D A

机构信息

Department of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Postgraduate Medical and Health Care Studies, Morriston Hospital, Swansea.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jul;76(4):245-50.

PMID:8074385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2502242/
Abstract

The call for screening for an increasing number of surgical diseases is becoming louder and more frequent. There is a general perception that screening is 'good' but it is important to consider the evidence carefully. There is one surgical disease that provides considerable experience of the process of screening over a period of 30 years and this is congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH). In retrospect, it is clear that screening for this disease has not been a total success. Although some specialised centres have achieved excellent results, in the country as a whole screening has been a failure. The reasons for this are analysed and emphasis is placed on the principles of screening which are briefly summarised. The results of various studies on screening and experiments on the basic functional anatomy of the neonatal hip are described. The initial results of our method of selective ultrasound screening appear to be encouraging and some evidence of a possible collagen abnormality in CDH is presented. As a general principle, however, it is suggested that strict randomised controlled trials should take place before national screening programmes are started.

摘要

对越来越多外科疾病进行筛查的呼声越来越高,也越来越频繁。人们普遍认为筛查是“有益的”,但仔细考虑相关证据很重要。有一种外科疾病在30年的时间里提供了大量关于筛查过程的经验,这就是先天性髋关节脱位(CDH)。回顾过去,很明显对这种疾病的筛查并非完全成功。尽管一些专业中心取得了优异的成果,但在全国范围内筛查是失败的。分析了其中的原因,并强调了筛查的原则,这些原则将简要总结。描述了关于筛查的各种研究结果以及新生儿髋关节基本功能解剖的实验。我们的选择性超声筛查方法的初步结果似乎令人鼓舞,并提出了一些先天性髋关节脱位可能存在胶原蛋白异常的证据。然而,作为一般原则,建议在启动全国性筛查计划之前应进行严格的随机对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5a6/2502242/be97961df482/annrcse01590-0040-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5a6/2502242/e4da6b38d8bc/annrcse01590-0038-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5a6/2502242/be97961df482/annrcse01590-0040-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5a6/2502242/e4da6b38d8bc/annrcse01590-0038-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5a6/2502242/be97961df482/annrcse01590-0040-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Principles of screening and congenital dislocation of the hip.髋关节筛查原则与先天性髋关节脱位
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jul;76(4):245-50.
2
Neonatal hip screening.新生儿髋关节筛查
Lancet. 2003 Feb 15;361(9357):595-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12519-6.
3
Ultrasound hip screening: why bother?超声髋关节筛查:为何要这么做?
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Dec;98(12):985. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305408.
4
Cochrane Review: Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants.Cochrane系统评价:新生儿髋关节发育不良的筛查项目
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jan;8(1):11-54. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1891.
5
[Sonography of the hip in infants].[婴儿髋关节超声检查]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1990 Jul-Aug;128(4):355-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039876.
6
[Follow-up control of ultrasonographic neonatal screening of the hip].[新生儿髋关节超声筛查的随访监测]
Ultraschall Med. 1999 Aug;20(4):161-4. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-8899.
7
Routine ultrasound screening for neonatal hip instability. Can it abolish late-presenting congenital dislocation of the hip?
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Jul;76(4):534-8.
8
[The congenital dislocation of the hip joint in ultrasound examination--frequency, diagnosis and treatment].[超声检查先天性髋关节脱位——发生率、诊断与治疗]
Klin Padiatr. 1999 Jan-Feb;211(1):18-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1043756.
9
Late dislocation of the hip following normal neonatal clinical and ultrasound examination.正常新生儿临床及超声检查后出现的晚期髋关节脱位。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Oct;92(10):1449-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24694.
10
[Early detection of hip dysplasia in the neonatal period].新生儿期髋关节发育不良的早期检测
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1991 Aug;139(8):471-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Decline in the incidence of late diagnosed congenital dislocation of the hip.晚发性先天性髋关节脱位发病率的下降。
Ir J Med Sci. 1997 Apr-Jun;166(2):85-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02944194.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple screening.多次筛查
Lancet. 1963 Jul 13;2(7298):51-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)90059-x.
2
Environmental influences related to the aetiology of congenital dislocation of the hip.与先天性髋关节脱位病因相关的环境影响因素。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1958 Jan;12(1):8-22. doi: 10.1136/jech.12.1.8.
3
Congenital hip dislocation: an increasing and still uncontrolled disability?先天性髋关节脱位:一种日益增多且仍未得到有效控制的残疾?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Nov 27;285(6354):1527-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6354.1527.
4
Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography.通过超声检查对髋关节发育不良进行分类。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1984;102(4):248-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00436138.
5
Validation of screening procedures.筛查程序的验证
Br Med Bull. 1971 Jan;27(1):3-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070810.
6
Congenital dislocation of the hip: early and late diagnosis and management compared.先天性髋关节脱位:早期与晚期诊断及治疗对比
Arch Dis Child. 1985 May;60(5):407-14. doi: 10.1136/adc.60.5.407.
7
An epidemiological assessment of neonatal screening for dislocation of the hip.新生儿髋关节脱位筛查的流行病学评估。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1986 Jan;20(1):56-62.
8
Ultrasound screening for hip abnormalities: preliminary findings in 1001 neonates.髋关节异常的超声筛查:1001例新生儿的初步研究结果
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Sep 20;293(6549):719-22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6549.719.
9
Ultrasound screening of hips at risk for CDH. Failure to reduce the incidence of late cases.对有发育性髋关节发育不良(CDH)风险的髋关节进行超声筛查。未能降低晚期病例的发生率。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Jan;71(1):9-12. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B1.2644290.
10
Ultrasound and neonatal hip screening. A prospective study of 'high risk' babies.超声与新生儿髋关节筛查。一项针对“高危”婴儿的前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 May;72(3):457-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B3.2187878.