• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安乐死。历史、伦理与实证视角。

Euthanasia. Historical, ethical, and empiric perspectives.

作者信息

Emanuel E J

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Epidemiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1994 Sep 12;154(17):1890-901. doi: 10.1001/archinte.154.17.1890.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.154.17.1890
PMID:8074593
Abstract

Debates about the ethics of euthanasia date from ancient Greece and Rome. In 1870, S. D. Williams, a nonphysician, proposed that anesthetics be used to intentionally end the lives of patients. Between 1870 and 1936, a debate about the ethics of euthanasia raged in the United States and Britain. These debates predate and invoke different arguments than do debates about euthanasia in Germany. Recognizing the increased interest in euthanasia, this article reviews the definitions related to euthanasia, the historical record of debates concerning euthanasia, the arguments for and against euthanasia, the situation in the Netherlands, and the empirical data regarding euthanasia in the United States.

摘要

关于安乐死伦理的辩论可追溯到古希腊和罗马时期。1870年,非医生S.D.威廉姆斯提议使用麻醉剂故意结束患者生命。1870年至1936年间,美国和英国就安乐死伦理展开了激烈辩论。这些辩论比德国关于安乐死的辩论更早出现,且涉及不同的论点。鉴于人们对安乐死的兴趣日益浓厚,本文回顾了与安乐死相关的定义、关于安乐死辩论的历史记录、支持和反对安乐死的论点、荷兰的情况以及美国关于安乐死的实证数据。

相似文献

1
Euthanasia. Historical, ethical, and empiric perspectives.安乐死。历史、伦理与实证视角。
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Sep 12;154(17):1890-901. doi: 10.1001/archinte.154.17.1890.
2
The history of euthanasia debates in the United States and Britain.美国和英国安乐死辩论的历史。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Nov 15;121(10):793-802. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-10-199411150-00010.
3
Euthanasia in The Netherlands: facts and moral arguments.荷兰的安乐死:事实与道德论据。
Ann Oncol. 1993 Jun;4(6):447-50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058549.
4
Euthanasia in old age: a case study and ethical analysis.老年安乐死:一个案例研究与伦理分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983 May;31(5):294-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb04874.x.
5
Euthanasia 1990--attitudes in Britain, USA and The Netherlands.1990年的安乐死——英国、美国和荷兰的态度。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1991 May;49(3):176-83.
6
Supportive care and euthanasia--an ethical dilemma?支持性护理与安乐死——一个伦理困境?
Support Care Cancer. 1998 Mar;6(2):114-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200050144.
7
Voluntary euthanasia and the risks of abuse: can we learn anything from The Netherlands?自愿安乐死与滥用风险:我们能从荷兰学到什么?
Law Med Health Care. 1992 Spring-Summer;20(1-2):133-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01180.x.
8
Dutch euthanasia: background, practice, and present justifications.荷兰的安乐死:背景、实践及当前的正当理由。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Winter;2(1):19-31; discussion 31-5. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000058x.
9
A good death: is euthanasia the answer?善终:安乐死是答案吗?
Cleve Clin J Med. 1992 Jan-Feb;59(1):99-109. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.59.1.99.
10
Euthanasia.安乐死
Crit Care Clin. 1996 Jan;12(1):85-96. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70216-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Historical Review of Euthanasia. From Ancient Times until before Modern Times.安乐死的历史回顾。从古代到近代之前。
Maedica (Bucur). 2025 Mar;20(1):117-119. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.1.117.
2
Euthanasia - A Legal or Medical Issue: A Narrative Review.安乐死——一个法律还是医学问题:一篇叙述性综述
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jun;54(6):1153-1159. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i6.18893.
3
Attitudes of undergraduate medical students towards end-of-life decisions: a systematic review of influencing factors.本科医学生对临终决策的态度:影响因素的系统评价
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 2;25(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07077-y.
4
Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs.当代精神病学中的伦理挑战:概述及对可能策略与研究需求的评估
World Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;23(3):364-386. doi: 10.1002/wps.21230.
5
Knowledge and attitudes of physicians in Chile toward Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation orders: A cross-sectional nation-wide study.智利医生对“不要尝试心肺复苏”医嘱的认知与态度:一项全国性横断面研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Jun 12;12:20503121241259285. doi: 10.1177/20503121241259285. eCollection 2024.
6
Catholic Teaching: A Middle Ground and Guide for End-of-Life Care and Decision-Making and an Antidote for Dying Badly in America.天主教教义:临终关怀与决策的中间立场及指南,也是美国避免糟糕死亡的一剂良方。
Linacre Q. 2024 Feb;91(1):52-73. doi: 10.1177/00243639221141230. Epub 2023 May 4.
7
Exploring the role of AI in classifying, analyzing, and generating case reports on assisted suicide cases: feasibility and ethical implications.探索人工智能在对协助自杀案例进行分类、分析和生成案例报告中的作用:可行性与伦理意义。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Dec 14;6:1328865. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1328865. eCollection 2023.
8
Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study.斯里兰卡医学生和医生对安乐死的态度:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 7;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00731-2.
9
Relationship Between COVID-19, Euthanasia and Old Age: A Study from a Legal-Ethical Perspective.新冠疫情、安乐死与老龄化:法律伦理视角的研究
J Relig Health. 2021 Aug;60(4):2250-2284. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01280-z. Epub 2021 May 20.
10
New Zealand medical students' views of euthanasia/assisted dying across different year levels.新西兰不同年级医学生对安乐死/协助死亡的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 23;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02558-2.