Court of Murcia (Spain), C/ Alfonso XIII, no 2, 30832, Javalí Nuevo, Murcia, Spain.
J Relig Health. 2021 Aug;60(4):2250-2284. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01280-z. Epub 2021 May 20.
The global pandemic situation created by COVID-19 leaves many questions open in areas as diverse as politics, economics, society and ethics. The scarcity of health resources and the use that has been made of these by some governments raises the question of whether the distribution of health resources has been equitable, or whether the allocation of health resources depended on criteria such as age. The present work investigates whether those countries or geographical areas where euthanasia is legalized, decriminalized or socially accepted, have followed selective policies limiting access to healthcare by the elderly, thus undermining what is understood as quality of life.
由 COVID-19 引发的全球大流行形势,在政治、经济、社会和伦理等多个领域留下了诸多未解之谜。卫生资源的稀缺性以及部分政府对这些资源的利用,引发了人们对卫生资源分配是否公平,或者卫生资源的分配是否取决于年龄等标准的质疑。本研究旨在探讨那些安乐死合法化、非刑罪化或被社会接受的国家或地区,是否采取了选择性政策限制老年人获得医疗保健,从而损害了人们所理解的生活质量。